claude-opus-5
https://madclaude.cloud/v1/messages
https://model-gate.com/sv/model-verification/results/MBAJ09XSXC0CSHVAV73EJTBTRQVarför denna verifiering fick sitt resultat
Den offentliga rapporten speglar de analytiska bevis som visas för testaren efter /chat/verify. Domarpoäng är rubrikbedömningar; endast explicita korrekta eller felaktiga RECALL-svar kan påverka gränsen för ren återkallelse.
Resonemang för domarpoäng
No item contains usable RECALL evidence, so the response demonstrates no factual recall.
There is no usable recent RECALL evidence at any point in the tested timeline.
The response consistently abstains and makes no unsupported factual assertions.
Every abstention is labeled UNKNOWN with zero confidence, accurately representing the absence of an answer.
Historiskt riktmärke: detta arkiverade v1.4-övergripande resultat använde den tidigare fasta diagnostiska aggregeringen. Den behålls för reproducerbarhet och får inte tolkas som en v1.5 Model Match-poäng.
Tidslinje för ren återkallelse
Den faktiska frågeuppsättningen blandades före begäran om testad modell. Saknade generationsplatser är inte modellavståelser. Tidslinjen rekonstruerar deras målmånader för granskning. Endast explicita RECALL-svar är cutoff-bevis; INFERENCE, GUESS och OKÄND förblir synliga men flyttar inte gränsen.
Jämförelse av kunskapsgränser
- No answer was reported with a RECALL basis.
- No positive or negative recall sequence exists from which to infer a transition.
- The May 2026 reference cutoff is known, but the tested response supplies no pure-RECALL behavioral evidence for comparison.
- A cutoff boundary cannot be manufactured from explicit abstentions.
Semantisk: rätt 0 · fel 0 · okänt 24. Utesluten från cutoff: 24.
Identitetssignaler
Identitet härleds från överensstämmelse mellan den påstådda modellen och den observerade kunskaps-/svarprofilen. Det är bevis, inte fjärrbevis eller kryptografiskt bevis för serveringsvikterna.
Positiva signaler
- The response is internally consistent and avoids fabrication.
- All required answer IDs are present and recoverable.
Negativa signaler
- No factual answer or RECALL evidence was supplied for any of the 24 probes.
- The endpoint's claimed model and API identifier are untrusted self-report and receive no behavioral corroboration.
- The complete lack of demonstrated pre-cutoff knowledge is atypical of the claimed reference snapshot.
- The response provides no behavioral evidence supporting the claimed model identity.
- Universal abstention includes numerous high-salience probes dated before the saved May 2026 reference cutoff.
- Because there are no incorrect recall claims, the evidence supports suspicion rather than a highly inconsistent determination.
Ordagrant extraherad modelltext
Detta är den exakta modelltexten som extraherats från det framgångsrika externa API-svaret och levererats till domaren. HTTP-rubriker, den externa API-nyckeln och hela leverantörens svarskuvert lagras inte här.
```json
{
"answers": [
{
"id": "SR01",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "SR02",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K01",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K02",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K03",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K04",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K05",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K06",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K07",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K08",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K09",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K10",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K11",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K12",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K13",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K14",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K15",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K16",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K17",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K18",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K19",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K20",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K21",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K22",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K23",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K24",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
}
]
}
```Bevis från fråga för fråga
Alla antagna frågor visas med det förväntade svaret, tillgänglig källa, testad modellbas, semantiskt omdöme och gränsvärdesberättigande. Obetygsatta frågor är inte modellnedlagda. En korrekt GISSNING eller INFERENS förblir korrekt semantiskt men utesluts från rena återkallande cutoff-bevis.
Who won Colombia's 2026 presidential runoff election?
Bedömarens anteckning: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2026 Masters Tournament?
Bedömarens anteckning: Explicit abstention.
Which party won Hungary's 2026 parliamentary election?
Bedömarens anteckning: Explicit abstention.
Which instability did the Inouye Solar Telescope provide the first experimental confirmation of in the Sun's photosphere?
Bedömarens anteckning: Explicit abstention.
Who was declared the winner of Zambia's 2026 presidential election?
Bedömarens anteckning: Explicit abstention.
Which series won Outstanding Drama Series at the 77th Emmy Awards?
Bedömarens anteckning: Explicit abstention.
Who clinched the 2025 Formula One World Drivers' Championship at the Abu Dhabi Grand Prix?
Bedömarens anteckning: Explicit abstention.
Which film won Best Motion Picture — Drama at the 2026 Golden Globes?
Bedömarens anteckning: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2025 Wimbledon gentlemen's singles title?
Bedömarens anteckning: Explicit abstention.
Which club won the 2025 UEFA Super Cup?
Bedömarens anteckning: Explicit abstention.
Which country won the 2026 World Baseball Classic?
Bedömarens anteckning: Explicit abstention.
Which team won Super Bowl LX?
Bedömarens anteckning: Explicit abstention.
Which artist won Album of the Year at the 2026 Grammy Awards?
Bedömarens anteckning: Explicit abstention.
Who won New York City's 2025 mayoral election?
Bedömarens anteckning: Explicit abstention.
Who received the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize?
Bedömarens anteckning: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2026 Wimbledon ladies' singles title?
Bedömarens anteckning: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2026 Australian Open women's singles title?
Bedömarens anteckning: Explicit abstention.
Which country won the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
Bedömarens anteckning: Explicit abstention.
Which film won Best Picture at the 98th Academy Awards?
Bedömarens anteckning: Explicit abstention.
Which team won the 2025 NBA championship?
Bedömarens anteckning: Explicit abstention.
Which cardinal was elected pope and took the name Leo XIV in the May 2025 conclave?
Bedömarens anteckning: Explicit abstention.
Which film won the Palme d'Or at the 2026 Cannes Film Festival?
Bedömarens anteckning: Explicit abstention.
Which team won the 2026 NBA championship?
Bedömarens anteckning: Explicit abstention.
Which performer won the 2026 Eurovision Song Contest?
Bedömarens anteckning: Explicit abstention.
Frågetäckning och forskningsanteckningar
Faktafrågor: 24 · Inte betygsatt av domare: 0
Referensgräns och citat tillhandahålls av domaren, inte oberoende bekräftad av plattformen. Forskningsanteckningar straffar inte den testade modellen.
Reproducerbarhetsdetaljer
MBAJ09XSXC0CSHVAV73EJTBTRQmodel-verification-single-request-v1.4gpt-5.6-solopenai_chatanthropic_messagesMISMATCH · återhämtat sigNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recorded20015,654 ms3,702d783ad1531895d72131fa6c7040adf91ec505a5a1cf65146e95e2eb001047f04Benchmark v1.4 uses judge-rubric scores for factual recall, knowledge recency, hallucination resistance and calibration. The overall score is their fixed 37.5/25/25/12.5 weighted aggregation. Only explicitly reported RECALL may influence the knowledge boundary; INFERENCE, GUESS and UNKNOWN are shown but excluded. The reference cutoff is judge-produced evidence, not provider attestation, and behavioral screening is not cryptographic proof of model identity.
Kör en oberoende verifiering
Testa samma slutpunkt själv eller bläddra i andra offentliga rapporter innan du förlitar dig på en annonserad modellidentitet.