claude-opus-5
https://madclaude.cloud/v1/messages
https://model-gate.com/es/model-verification/results/MBAJ09XSXC0CSHVAV73EJTBTRQ¿Por qué esta verificación recibió su resultado?
El informe público refleja la evidencia analítica que se muestra al evaluador después de /chat/verify. Las puntuaciones de los jueces son evaluaciones de rúbricas; sólo las respuestas RECALL explícitas, correctas o incorrectas, pueden influir en el límite de recuperación pura.
Justificación de la puntuación del juez
No item contains usable RECALL evidence, so the response demonstrates no factual recall.
There is no usable recent RECALL evidence at any point in the tested timeline.
The response consistently abstains and makes no unsupported factual assertions.
Every abstention is labeled UNKNOWN with zero confidence, accurately representing the absence of an answer.
Nota de referencia histórica: esta puntuación general archivada v1.4 utilizó la agregación de diagnóstico fija anterior. Se conserva para fines de reproducibilidad y no debe interpretarse como una puntuación de Model Match v1.5.
Cronología de recuerdo puro
El conjunto de preguntas real se barajó antes de la solicitud del modelo probado. Los espacios de generación que faltan no son abstenciones modelo. El cronograma reconstruye los meses objetivo para la auditabilidad. Sólo las respuestas RECALL explícitas son evidencia de corte; INFERENCIA, ADIVINAR y DESCONOCIDO permanecen visibles pero no mueven el límite.
Comparación de límites de conocimiento
- No answer was reported with a RECALL basis.
- No positive or negative recall sequence exists from which to infer a transition.
- The May 2026 reference cutoff is known, but the tested response supplies no pure-RECALL behavioral evidence for comparison.
- A cutoff boundary cannot be manufactured from explicit abstentions.
Semántico: correcto 0 · incorrecto 0 · desconocido 24. Excluido del límite: 24.
Señales de identidad
La identidad se infiere de la coherencia entre el modelo reivindicado y el perfil de conocimiento/respuesta observado. Es una evidencia, no una certificación remota o una prueba criptográfica de los pesos de las porciones.
Señales positivas
- The response is internally consistent and avoids fabrication.
- All required answer IDs are present and recoverable.
Señales negativas
- No factual answer or RECALL evidence was supplied for any of the 24 probes.
- The endpoint's claimed model and API identifier are untrusted self-report and receive no behavioral corroboration.
- The complete lack of demonstrated pre-cutoff knowledge is atypical of the claimed reference snapshot.
- The response provides no behavioral evidence supporting the claimed model identity.
- Universal abstention includes numerous high-salience probes dated before the saved May 2026 reference cutoff.
- Because there are no incorrect recall claims, the evidence supports suspicion rather than a highly inconsistent determination.
Texto del modelo extraído palabra por palabra
Este es el texto del modelo exacto extraído de la respuesta exitosa de la API externa y proporcionado al juez. Los encabezados HTTP, la clave API externa y el sobre de respuesta completo del proveedor no se almacenan aquí.
```json
{
"answers": [
{
"id": "SR01",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "SR02",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K01",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K02",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K03",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K04",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K05",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K06",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K07",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K08",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K09",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K10",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K11",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K12",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K13",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K14",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K15",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K16",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K17",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K18",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K19",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K20",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K21",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K22",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K23",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K24",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
}
]
}
```Evidencia pregunta por pregunta
Todas las preguntas admitidas se muestran con la respuesta esperada, la fuente disponible, la base del modelo probado, el veredicto semántico y el límite de elegibilidad. Las preguntas sin calificación no son abstenciones modelo. Una CONDICIÓN o INFERENCIA correcta sigue siendo semánticamente correcta, pero se excluye de la evidencia de corte de recuerdo puro.
Who won Colombia's 2026 presidential runoff election?
Nota del evaluador: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2026 Masters Tournament?
Nota del evaluador: Explicit abstention.
Which party won Hungary's 2026 parliamentary election?
Nota del evaluador: Explicit abstention.
Which instability did the Inouye Solar Telescope provide the first experimental confirmation of in the Sun's photosphere?
Nota del evaluador: Explicit abstention.
Who was declared the winner of Zambia's 2026 presidential election?
Nota del evaluador: Explicit abstention.
Which series won Outstanding Drama Series at the 77th Emmy Awards?
Nota del evaluador: Explicit abstention.
Who clinched the 2025 Formula One World Drivers' Championship at the Abu Dhabi Grand Prix?
Nota del evaluador: Explicit abstention.
Which film won Best Motion Picture — Drama at the 2026 Golden Globes?
Nota del evaluador: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2025 Wimbledon gentlemen's singles title?
Nota del evaluador: Explicit abstention.
Which club won the 2025 UEFA Super Cup?
Nota del evaluador: Explicit abstention.
Which country won the 2026 World Baseball Classic?
Nota del evaluador: Explicit abstention.
Which team won Super Bowl LX?
Nota del evaluador: Explicit abstention.
Which artist won Album of the Year at the 2026 Grammy Awards?
Nota del evaluador: Explicit abstention.
Who won New York City's 2025 mayoral election?
Nota del evaluador: Explicit abstention.
Who received the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize?
Nota del evaluador: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2026 Wimbledon ladies' singles title?
Nota del evaluador: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2026 Australian Open women's singles title?
Nota del evaluador: Explicit abstention.
Which country won the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
Nota del evaluador: Explicit abstention.
Which film won Best Picture at the 98th Academy Awards?
Nota del evaluador: Explicit abstention.
Which team won the 2025 NBA championship?
Nota del evaluador: Explicit abstention.
Which cardinal was elected pope and took the name Leo XIV in the May 2025 conclave?
Nota del evaluador: Explicit abstention.
Which film won the Palme d'Or at the 2026 Cannes Film Festival?
Nota del evaluador: Explicit abstention.
Which team won the 2026 NBA championship?
Nota del evaluador: Explicit abstention.
Which performer won the 2026 Eurovision Song Contest?
Nota del evaluador: Explicit abstention.
Cobertura de preguntas y notas de investigación.
Preguntas fácticas: 24 · No calificado por el juez: 0
El corte de referencia y las citas son proporcionadas por el juez, no confirmadas de forma independiente por la plataforma. Las notas de investigación no penalizan el modelo probado.
Detalles de reproducibilidad
MBAJ09XSXC0CSHVAV73EJTBTRQmodel-verification-single-request-v1.4gpt-5.6-solopenai_chatanthropic_messagesMISMATCH · recuperadoNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recorded20015,654 ms3,702d783ad1531895d72131fa6c7040adf91ec505a5a1cf65146e95e2eb001047f04Benchmark v1.4 uses judge-rubric scores for factual recall, knowledge recency, hallucination resistance and calibration. The overall score is their fixed 37.5/25/25/12.5 weighted aggregation. Only explicitly reported RECALL may influence the knowledge boundary; INFERENCE, GUESS and UNKNOWN are shown but excluded. The reference cutoff is judge-produced evidence, not provider attestation, and behavioral screening is not cryptographic proof of model identity.
Ejecute una verificación independiente
Pruebe usted mismo el mismo punto final o explore otros informes públicos antes de confiar en una identidad de modelo anunciada.