claude-opus-5
https://madclaude.cloud/v1/messages
https://model-gate.com/ro/model-verification/results/MBAJ09XSXC0CSHVAV73EJTBTRQDe ce a primit rezultatul acestei verificări
Raportul public reflectă dovezile analitice prezentate testatorului după /chat/verify. Scorurile judecătorilor sunt evaluări rubrica; numai răspunsurile RECALL explicite, corecte sau greșite, pot influența limita limită de rechemare pură.
Motivul punctajului judecătorului
No item contains usable RECALL evidence, so the response demonstrates no factual recall.
There is no usable recent RECALL evidence at any point in the tested timeline.
The response consistently abstains and makes no unsupported factual assertions.
Every abstention is labeled UNKNOWN with zero confidence, accurately representing the absence of an answer.
Notă de referință istorică: acest scor general arhivat v1.4 a folosit fosta agregare fixă de diagnosticare. Este păstrat pentru reproductibilitate și nu trebuie interpretat ca un scor de potrivire a modelului v1.5.
Cronologie pură de reamintire
Setul real de întrebări a fost amestecat înainte de solicitarea modelului testat. Sloturile de generație lipsă nu sunt abțineri de model. Cronologia reconstruiește lunile țintă pentru auditabilitate. Doar răspunsurile RECALL explicite sunt dovezi tăiate; INFERENȚĂ, GHICI și NECUNOSCUT rămân vizibile, dar nu mută granița.
Compararea limitelor de cunoștințe
- No answer was reported with a RECALL basis.
- No positive or negative recall sequence exists from which to infer a transition.
- The May 2026 reference cutoff is known, but the tested response supplies no pure-RECALL behavioral evidence for comparison.
- A cutoff boundary cannot be manufactured from explicit abstentions.
Semantic: corect 0 · incorect 0 · necunoscut 24. Exclus din cutoff: 24.
Semnale de identitate
Identitatea este dedusă din coerența dintre modelul revendicat și profilul de cunoștințe/răspuns observat. Este o dovadă, nu o atestare de la distanță sau o dovadă criptografică a greutăților porției.
Semnale pozitive
- The response is internally consistent and avoids fabrication.
- All required answer IDs are present and recoverable.
Semnale negative
- No factual answer or RECALL evidence was supplied for any of the 24 probes.
- The endpoint's claimed model and API identifier are untrusted self-report and receive no behavioral corroboration.
- The complete lack of demonstrated pre-cutoff knowledge is atypical of the claimed reference snapshot.
- The response provides no behavioral evidence supporting the claimed model identity.
- Universal abstention includes numerous high-salience probes dated before the saved May 2026 reference cutoff.
- Because there are no incorrect recall claims, the evidence supports suspicion rather than a highly inconsistent determination.
Text model extras literal
Acesta este textul model exact extras din răspunsul API extern de succes și furnizat judecătorului. Antetele HTTP, cheia API externă și plicul complet de răspuns al furnizorului nu sunt stocate aici.
```json
{
"answers": [
{
"id": "SR01",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "SR02",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K01",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K02",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K03",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K04",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K05",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K06",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K07",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K08",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K09",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K10",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K11",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K12",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K13",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K14",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K15",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K16",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K17",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K18",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K19",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K20",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K21",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K22",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K23",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K24",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
}
]
}
```Dovezi întrebare cu întrebare
Toate întrebările admise sunt afișate cu răspunsul așteptat, sursa disponibilă, baza modelului testat, verdictul semantic și eligibilitatea limită. Întrebările negradate nu sunt abțineri model. O PRECIZARE sau INFERENȚĂ corectă rămâne corectă din punct de vedere semantic, dar este exclusă din dovezile de reducere a reamintirii.
Who won Colombia's 2026 presidential runoff election?
Notă a evaluatorului: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2026 Masters Tournament?
Notă a evaluatorului: Explicit abstention.
Which party won Hungary's 2026 parliamentary election?
Notă a evaluatorului: Explicit abstention.
Which instability did the Inouye Solar Telescope provide the first experimental confirmation of in the Sun's photosphere?
Notă a evaluatorului: Explicit abstention.
Who was declared the winner of Zambia's 2026 presidential election?
Notă a evaluatorului: Explicit abstention.
Which series won Outstanding Drama Series at the 77th Emmy Awards?
Notă a evaluatorului: Explicit abstention.
Who clinched the 2025 Formula One World Drivers' Championship at the Abu Dhabi Grand Prix?
Notă a evaluatorului: Explicit abstention.
Which film won Best Motion Picture — Drama at the 2026 Golden Globes?
Notă a evaluatorului: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2025 Wimbledon gentlemen's singles title?
Notă a evaluatorului: Explicit abstention.
Which club won the 2025 UEFA Super Cup?
Notă a evaluatorului: Explicit abstention.
Which country won the 2026 World Baseball Classic?
Notă a evaluatorului: Explicit abstention.
Which team won Super Bowl LX?
Notă a evaluatorului: Explicit abstention.
Which artist won Album of the Year at the 2026 Grammy Awards?
Notă a evaluatorului: Explicit abstention.
Who won New York City's 2025 mayoral election?
Notă a evaluatorului: Explicit abstention.
Who received the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize?
Notă a evaluatorului: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2026 Wimbledon ladies' singles title?
Notă a evaluatorului: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2026 Australian Open women's singles title?
Notă a evaluatorului: Explicit abstention.
Which country won the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
Notă a evaluatorului: Explicit abstention.
Which film won Best Picture at the 98th Academy Awards?
Notă a evaluatorului: Explicit abstention.
Which team won the 2025 NBA championship?
Notă a evaluatorului: Explicit abstention.
Which cardinal was elected pope and took the name Leo XIV in the May 2025 conclave?
Notă a evaluatorului: Explicit abstention.
Which film won the Palme d'Or at the 2026 Cannes Film Festival?
Notă a evaluatorului: Explicit abstention.
Which team won the 2026 NBA championship?
Notă a evaluatorului: Explicit abstention.
Which performer won the 2026 Eurovision Song Contest?
Notă a evaluatorului: Explicit abstention.
Acoperirea întrebărilor și note de cercetare
Întrebări de fapt: 24 · Nu este notat de judecător: 0
Limitele de referință și citările sunt furnizate de judecător, nu confirmate independent de platformă. Notele cercetării nu penalizează modelul testat.
Detalii de reproductibilitate
MBAJ09XSXC0CSHVAV73EJTBTRQmodel-verification-single-request-v1.4gpt-5.6-solopenai_chatanthropic_messagesNEPOTRIVIRE · recuperatNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recorded20015,654 ms3,702d783ad1531895d72131fa6c7040adf91ec505a5a1cf65146e95e2eb001047f04Benchmark v1.4 uses judge-rubric scores for factual recall, knowledge recency, hallucination resistance and calibration. The overall score is their fixed 37.5/25/25/12.5 weighted aggregation. Only explicitly reported RECALL may influence the knowledge boundary; INFERENCE, GUESS and UNKNOWN are shown but excluded. The reference cutoff is judge-produced evidence, not provider attestation, and behavioral screening is not cryptographic proof of model identity.
Efectuați o verificare independentă
Testați singur același punct final sau răsfoiți alte rapoarte publice înainte de a vă baza pe o identitate de model promovată.