claude-opus-5
https://madclaude.cloud/v1/messages
https://model-gate.com/ca/model-verification/results/V8Y3ZFEZK23179GX0M3MN6D36FPer què aquesta verificació va rebre el seu resultat
L'informe públic reflecteix l'evidència analítica mostrada al verificador després de /chat/verify. Les puntuacions dels jutges són avaluacions de rúbrica; només les respostes RECALL explícites correctes o incorrectes poden influir en el límit de tall de record pur.
Justificació de la puntuació del jutge
No factual probe contains usable RECALL evidence or a correct demonstrated answer.
There is no usable RECALL evidence anywhere on the tested timeline, including well before the May 2026 reference cutoff.
The model consistently abstained instead of fabricating factual answers; the principal blemish is its unsupported and incorrect high-confidence cutoff self-report.
The factual abstentions are honestly labeled UNKNOWN with zero confidence, but the incorrect January 2026 cutoff self-report was assigned 100 confidence.
Els punts de referència de concordança de models no fan una mitjana d'aquestes quatre puntuacions de diagnòstic en la identitat del model. La puntuació del títol del model Match prové de la rúbrica d'identitat del jutge; La resistència a l'al·lucinació i la calibració poden romandre elevades fins i tot quan la coincidència del model reclamat és molt baixa.
Línia de temps de record pur
El conjunt de preguntes real es va barrejar abans de la sol·licitud del model provat. Els espais de generació que falten no són abstencions de model. La línia de temps reconstrueix els mesos objectiu per a la seva auditabilitat. Només les respostes RECALL explícites són proves de tall; INFERÈNCIA, ENDEVINA i DESCONEGUT romanen visibles però no mouen el límit.
Comparació de talls de coneixement
- All 24 factual probes were explicit UNKNOWN responses.
- No RECALL item exists from which to infer a chronological transition.
- Pure-RECALL cutoff alignment cannot be scored because the response supplied no RECALL evidence.
- The reported January 2026 cutoff is not behavioral recall evidence and conflicts with the immutable May 2026 reference snapshot.
Semàntica: correcte 0 · incorrecte 0 · desconegut 24. Exclòs del tall: 24.
Senyals d'identitat
La identitat es dedueix de la coherència entre el model reivindicat i el perfil de coneixement/resposta observat. És una prova, no una certificació remota o una prova criptogràfica dels pesos de la porció.
Senyals positius
- The self-reported model name and provider match the claim, but self-report is weak identity evidence.
- The response avoided fabricated factual answers.
Senyals negatius
- Near-universal abstention includes all expected pre-cutoff knowledge probes.
- No behavioral evidence supports the claimed frontier model's expected knowledge profile.
- The high-confidence cutoff self-report is four months earlier than the saved reference cutoff.
Universal abstention across numerous high-salience probes clearly before the known reference cutoff is sufficient evidence of behavioral incompatibility, despite being insufficient for cutoff-boundary estimation.
- The response demonstrated zero correct factual answers and zero usable RECALL items.
- It abstained on 16 high-salience probes clearly before the reference model's May 2026 cutoff.
- It also abstained on both probes from the reference cutoff month.
- Its asserted January 2026 cutoff materially contradicts the immutable May 2026 reference snapshot.
Text model extret textualment
Aquest és el text model exacte extret de la resposta de l'API externa amb èxit i subministrat al jutge. Les capçaleres HTTP, la clau de l'API externa i el sobre de resposta del proveïdor complet no s'emmagatzemen aquí.
```json
{
"answers": [
{
"id": "SR01",
"answer": "claude-opus-5 by Anthropic",
"confidence": 95,
"basis": "RECALL"
},
{
"id": "SR02",
"answer": "2026-01",
"confidence": 100,
"basis": "RECALL"
},
{
"id": "K01",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K02",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K03",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K04",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K05",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K06",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K07",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K08",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K09",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K10",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K11",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K12",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K13",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K14",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K15",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K16",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K17",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K18",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K19",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K20",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K21",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K22",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K23",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K24",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
}
]
}
```Evidència pregunta per pregunta
Totes les preguntes admeses es mostren amb la resposta esperada, la font disponible, la base del model provat, el veredicte semàntic i l'elegibilitat de tall. Les preguntes no qualificades no són abstencions model. Una CONDECINA o INFERÈNCIA correcta segueix sent correcta semànticament, però s'exclou de l'evidència de tall de record pur.
Which film won Best Picture at the 98th Academy Awards?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
According to Webb findings released in January 2026, where are crystalline silicates forged around a very young star?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
Which team won Super Bowl LX?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
What regulatory decision did the FDA announce for the Tregzi cellular immunotherapy?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2026 Wimbledon men's singles title?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2025 Tour Championship and FedExCup?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
Which performer won the 2026 Eurovision Song Contest?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
Which team won the 2025 NBA Finals?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
Which country won the 2026 World Baseball Classic?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
Which team won the 2026 NBA Finals?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
Who won New York City's 2025 mayoral election?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2026 Australian Open women's singles title?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
Which club won the 2026 UEFA Super Cup?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
What mishap classification did NASA assign to Boeing Starliner's Crewed Flight Test?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
Which country won the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
Which club won the 2026 UEFA Champions League final?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
Which country won the 2026 Little League Baseball World Series?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
Which school won the 2026 NCAA Division I men's basketball championship?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2026 Masters Tournament?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
Who received the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
Who clinched the 2025 Formula One World Drivers' Championship?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
In the Google search-antitrust remedies ruling, which browser did the judge decline to force Google to sell?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
Which performer won the 2025 Eurovision Song Contest?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2025 Wimbledon gentlemen's singles title?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
Cobertura de preguntes i notes de recerca
Preguntes de fet: 24 · No qualificat pel jutge: 0
El tall de referència i les citacions són proporcionades pel jutge, no confirmades de manera independent per la plataforma. Les notes de recerca no penalitzen el model provat.
Detalls de reproductibilitat
V8Y3ZFEZK23179GX0M3MN6D36Fmodel-verification-single-request-v1.5gpt-5.6-solopenai_chatanthropic_messagesDISCORD · recuperatNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recorded20019,443 ms3,6562989988b859c9bb90c50291bd34b6ed7423cf3b8c28c3d3915f4f245e99aaaebBenchmark v1.5 uses the judge's Model Match Score as the main Verification score. Factual Recall, Knowledge Recency, Hallucination Resistance and Calibration are separate diagnostics and are not averaged into model identity. Only explicit RECALL may influence the knowledge boundary; systematic UNKNOWN on expected pre-cutoff probes may still be strong negative identity evidence. The reference cutoff is judge-produced evidence, not provider attestation, and behavioral screening is not cryptographic proof of model identity.
Executeu una verificació independent
Proveu vosaltres mateixos el mateix punt final o navegueu per altres informes públics abans de confiar en una identitat de model anunciada.