claude-opus-5
https://madclaude.cloud/v1/messages
https://model-gate.com/ca/model-verification/results/MBAJ09XSXC0CSHVAV73EJTBTRQPer què aquesta verificació va rebre el seu resultat
L'informe públic reflecteix l'evidència analítica mostrada al verificador després de /chat/verify. Les puntuacions dels jutges són avaluacions de rúbrica; només les respostes RECALL explícites correctes o incorrectes poden influir en el límit de tall de record pur.
Justificació de la puntuació del jutge
No item contains usable RECALL evidence, so the response demonstrates no factual recall.
There is no usable recent RECALL evidence at any point in the tested timeline.
The response consistently abstains and makes no unsupported factual assertions.
Every abstention is labeled UNKNOWN with zero confidence, accurately representing the absence of an answer.
Nota de referència històrica: aquesta puntuació global de la v1.4 arxivada utilitzava l'anterior agregació de diagnòstic fix. Es conserva per a la seva reproductibilitat i no s'ha d'interpretar com una puntuació de concordança del model v1.5.
Línia de temps de record pur
El conjunt de preguntes real es va barrejar abans de la sol·licitud del model provat. Els espais de generació que falten no són abstencions de model. La línia de temps reconstrueix els mesos objectiu per a la seva auditabilitat. Només les respostes RECALL explícites són proves de tall; INFERÈNCIA, ENDEVINA i DESCONEGUT romanen visibles però no mouen el límit.
Comparació de talls de coneixement
- No answer was reported with a RECALL basis.
- No positive or negative recall sequence exists from which to infer a transition.
- The May 2026 reference cutoff is known, but the tested response supplies no pure-RECALL behavioral evidence for comparison.
- A cutoff boundary cannot be manufactured from explicit abstentions.
Semàntica: correcte 0 · incorrecte 0 · desconegut 24. Exclòs del tall: 24.
Senyals d'identitat
La identitat es dedueix de la coherència entre el model reivindicat i el perfil de coneixement/resposta observat. És una prova, no una certificació remota o una prova criptogràfica dels pesos de la porció.
Senyals positius
- The response is internally consistent and avoids fabrication.
- All required answer IDs are present and recoverable.
Senyals negatius
- No factual answer or RECALL evidence was supplied for any of the 24 probes.
- The endpoint's claimed model and API identifier are untrusted self-report and receive no behavioral corroboration.
- The complete lack of demonstrated pre-cutoff knowledge is atypical of the claimed reference snapshot.
- The response provides no behavioral evidence supporting the claimed model identity.
- Universal abstention includes numerous high-salience probes dated before the saved May 2026 reference cutoff.
- Because there are no incorrect recall claims, the evidence supports suspicion rather than a highly inconsistent determination.
Text model extret textualment
Aquest és el text model exacte extret de la resposta de l'API externa amb èxit i subministrat al jutge. Les capçaleres HTTP, la clau de l'API externa i el sobre de resposta del proveïdor complet no s'emmagatzemen aquí.
```json
{
"answers": [
{
"id": "SR01",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "SR02",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K01",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K02",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K03",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K04",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K05",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K06",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K07",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K08",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K09",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K10",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K11",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K12",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K13",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K14",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K15",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K16",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K17",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K18",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K19",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K20",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K21",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K22",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K23",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K24",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
}
]
}
```Evidència pregunta per pregunta
Totes les preguntes admeses es mostren amb la resposta esperada, la font disponible, la base del model provat, el veredicte semàntic i l'elegibilitat de tall. Les preguntes no qualificades no són abstencions model. Una CONDECINA o INFERÈNCIA correcta segueix sent correcta semànticament, però s'exclou de l'evidència de tall de record pur.
Who won Colombia's 2026 presidential runoff election?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2026 Masters Tournament?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
Which party won Hungary's 2026 parliamentary election?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
Which instability did the Inouye Solar Telescope provide the first experimental confirmation of in the Sun's photosphere?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
Who was declared the winner of Zambia's 2026 presidential election?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
Which series won Outstanding Drama Series at the 77th Emmy Awards?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
Who clinched the 2025 Formula One World Drivers' Championship at the Abu Dhabi Grand Prix?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
Which film won Best Motion Picture — Drama at the 2026 Golden Globes?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2025 Wimbledon gentlemen's singles title?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
Which club won the 2025 UEFA Super Cup?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
Which country won the 2026 World Baseball Classic?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
Which team won Super Bowl LX?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
Which artist won Album of the Year at the 2026 Grammy Awards?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
Who won New York City's 2025 mayoral election?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
Who received the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2026 Wimbledon ladies' singles title?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2026 Australian Open women's singles title?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
Which country won the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
Which film won Best Picture at the 98th Academy Awards?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
Which team won the 2025 NBA championship?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
Which cardinal was elected pope and took the name Leo XIV in the May 2025 conclave?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
Which film won the Palme d'Or at the 2026 Cannes Film Festival?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
Which team won the 2026 NBA championship?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
Which performer won the 2026 Eurovision Song Contest?
Nota de l’avaluador: Explicit abstention.
Cobertura de preguntes i notes de recerca
Preguntes de fet: 24 · No qualificat pel jutge: 0
El tall de referència i les citacions són proporcionades pel jutge, no confirmades de manera independent per la plataforma. Les notes de recerca no penalitzen el model provat.
Detalls de reproductibilitat
MBAJ09XSXC0CSHVAV73EJTBTRQmodel-verification-single-request-v1.4gpt-5.6-solopenai_chatanthropic_messagesDISCORD · recuperatNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recorded20015,654 ms3,702d783ad1531895d72131fa6c7040adf91ec505a5a1cf65146e95e2eb001047f04Benchmark v1.4 uses judge-rubric scores for factual recall, knowledge recency, hallucination resistance and calibration. The overall score is their fixed 37.5/25/25/12.5 weighted aggregation. Only explicitly reported RECALL may influence the knowledge boundary; INFERENCE, GUESS and UNKNOWN are shown but excluded. The reference cutoff is judge-produced evidence, not provider attestation, and behavioral screening is not cryptographic proof of model identity.
Executeu una verificació independent
Proveu vosaltres mateixos el mateix punt final o navegueu per altres informes públics abans de confiar en una identitat de model anunciada.