claude-opus-5
https://madclaude.cloud/v1/messages
https://model-gate.com/zh/model-verification/results/MBAJ09XSXC0CSHVAV73EJTBTRQ为什么此验证收到结果
公开报告反映了 /chat/verify 之后向测试人员显示的分析证据。评委评分为评分标准;只有明确的正确或错误的回忆答案可能会影响纯回忆截止边界。
评委评分依据
No item contains usable RECALL evidence, so the response demonstrates no factual recall.
There is no usable recent RECALL evidence at any point in the tested timeline.
The response consistently abstains and makes no unsupported factual assertions.
Every abstention is labeled UNKNOWN with zero confidence, accurately representing the absence of an answer.
历史基准说明:此存档的 v1.4 总体分数使用了以前的固定诊断聚合。保留它是为了再现性,并且不得将其解释为 v1.5 模型匹配分数。
纯粹回忆时间线
实际问题集在测试模型请求之前被打乱。缺席一代并不是典型的弃权。该时间表重建了可审计性的目标月份。只有明确的 RECALL 答案才是截止证据;推论、猜测和未知仍然可见,但不会移动边界。
知识截止比较
- No answer was reported with a RECALL basis.
- No positive or negative recall sequence exists from which to infer a transition.
- The May 2026 reference cutoff is known, but the tested response supplies no pure-RECALL behavioral evidence for comparison.
- A cutoff boundary cannot be manufactured from explicit abstentions.
语义学: 正确 0 · 错误 0 · 未知 24. 排除在截止范围之外: 24.
身份信号
身份是根据所声称的模型与观察到的知识/答案概况之间的一致性推断出来的。它是证据,而不是份量的远程证明或加密证明。
积极信号
- The response is internally consistent and avoids fabrication.
- All required answer IDs are present and recoverable.
负面信号
- No factual answer or RECALL evidence was supplied for any of the 24 probes.
- The endpoint's claimed model and API identifier are untrusted self-report and receive no behavioral corroboration.
- The complete lack of demonstrated pre-cutoff knowledge is atypical of the claimed reference snapshot.
- The response provides no behavioral evidence supporting the claimed model identity.
- Universal abstention includes numerous high-salience probes dated before the saved May 2026 reference cutoff.
- Because there are no incorrect recall claims, the evidence supports suspicion rather than a highly inconsistent determination.
逐字提取模型文本
这是从成功的外部 API 响应中提取并提供给法官的确切模型文本。 HTTP 标头、外部 API 密钥和完整的提供商响应信封不存储在此处。
```json
{
"answers": [
{
"id": "SR01",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "SR02",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K01",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K02",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K03",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K04",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K05",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K06",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K07",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K08",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K09",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K10",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K11",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K12",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K13",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K14",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K15",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K16",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K17",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K18",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K19",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K20",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K21",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K22",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K23",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K24",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
}
]
}
```逐个问题的证据
所有承认的问题都会显示预期答案、可用来源、测试模型基础、语义判决和截止资格。未评分的问题不是典型的弃权问题。正确的猜测或推理在语义上仍然是正确的,但被排除在纯回忆截止证据之外。
Who won Colombia's 2026 presidential runoff election?
评估备注: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2026 Masters Tournament?
评估备注: Explicit abstention.
Which party won Hungary's 2026 parliamentary election?
评估备注: Explicit abstention.
Which instability did the Inouye Solar Telescope provide the first experimental confirmation of in the Sun's photosphere?
评估备注: Explicit abstention.
Who was declared the winner of Zambia's 2026 presidential election?
评估备注: Explicit abstention.
Which series won Outstanding Drama Series at the 77th Emmy Awards?
评估备注: Explicit abstention.
Who clinched the 2025 Formula One World Drivers' Championship at the Abu Dhabi Grand Prix?
评估备注: Explicit abstention.
Which film won Best Motion Picture — Drama at the 2026 Golden Globes?
评估备注: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2025 Wimbledon gentlemen's singles title?
评估备注: Explicit abstention.
Which club won the 2025 UEFA Super Cup?
评估备注: Explicit abstention.
Which country won the 2026 World Baseball Classic?
评估备注: Explicit abstention.
Which team won Super Bowl LX?
评估备注: Explicit abstention.
Which artist won Album of the Year at the 2026 Grammy Awards?
评估备注: Explicit abstention.
Who won New York City's 2025 mayoral election?
评估备注: Explicit abstention.
Who received the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize?
评估备注: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2026 Wimbledon ladies' singles title?
评估备注: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2026 Australian Open women's singles title?
评估备注: Explicit abstention.
Which country won the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
评估备注: Explicit abstention.
Which film won Best Picture at the 98th Academy Awards?
评估备注: Explicit abstention.
Which team won the 2025 NBA championship?
评估备注: Explicit abstention.
Which cardinal was elected pope and took the name Leo XIV in the May 2025 conclave?
评估备注: Explicit abstention.
Which film won the Palme d'Or at the 2026 Cannes Film Festival?
评估备注: Explicit abstention.
Which team won the 2026 NBA championship?
评估备注: Explicit abstention.
Which performer won the 2026 Eurovision Song Contest?
评估备注: Explicit abstention.
问题范围和研究笔记
事实问题: 24 · 没有被评委打分: 0
参考截止值和引文由法官提供,未经平台独立确认。研究笔记不会惩罚测试模型。
再现性细节
MBAJ09XSXC0CSHVAV73EJTBTRQmodel-verification-single-request-v1.4gpt-5.6-solopenai_chatanthropic_messages不匹配·已恢复Not recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recorded20015,654 ms3,702d783ad1531895d72131fa6c7040adf91ec505a5a1cf65146e95e2eb001047f04Benchmark v1.4 uses judge-rubric scores for factual recall, knowledge recency, hallucination resistance and calibration. The overall score is their fixed 37.5/25/25/12.5 weighted aggregation. Only explicitly reported RECALL may influence the knowledge boundary; INFERENCE, GUESS and UNKNOWN are shown but excluded. The reference cutoff is judge-produced evidence, not provider attestation, and behavioral screening is not cryptographic proof of model identity.