claude-opus-5
https://madclaude.cloud/v1/messages
https://model-gate.com/pt/model-verification/results/MBAJ09XSXC0CSHVAV73EJTBTRQPor que esta verificação recebeu seu resultado
O relatório público reflete a evidência analítica mostrada ao testador após /chat/verify. As pontuações dos juízes são avaliações de rubricas; apenas respostas RECALL corretas ou erradas explícitas podem influenciar o limite de corte de recordação pura.
Justificativa de pontuação do juiz
No item contains usable RECALL evidence, so the response demonstrates no factual recall.
There is no usable recent RECALL evidence at any point in the tested timeline.
The response consistently abstains and makes no unsupported factual assertions.
Every abstention is labeled UNKNOWN with zero confidence, accurately representing the absence of an answer.
Nota de referência histórica: esta pontuação geral arquivada da versão 1.4 usou a antiga agregação de diagnóstico fixa. Ela é mantida para fins de reprodutibilidade e não deve ser interpretada como uma pontuação de Model Match v1.5.
Linha do tempo de recall puro
O conjunto de perguntas real foi embaralhado antes da solicitação do modelo testado. Os slots de geração ausentes não são abstenções modelo. A linha do tempo reconstrói os meses-alvo para auditabilidade. Somente respostas RECALL explícitas são evidências de corte; INFERENCE, GUESS e UNKNOWN permanecem visíveis, mas não movem o limite.
Comparação de limite de conhecimento
- No answer was reported with a RECALL basis.
- No positive or negative recall sequence exists from which to infer a transition.
- The May 2026 reference cutoff is known, but the tested response supplies no pure-RECALL behavioral evidence for comparison.
- A cutoff boundary cannot be manufactured from explicit abstentions.
Semântica: correto 0 · incorreto 0 · desconhecido 24. Excluído do corte: 24.
Sinais de identidade
A identidade é inferida a partir da consistência entre o modelo reivindicado e o perfil de conhecimento/resposta observado. É uma evidência, não um atestado remoto ou prova criptográfica dos pesos da porção.
Sinais positivos
- The response is internally consistent and avoids fabrication.
- All required answer IDs are present and recoverable.
Sinais negativos
- No factual answer or RECALL evidence was supplied for any of the 24 probes.
- The endpoint's claimed model and API identifier are untrusted self-report and receive no behavioral corroboration.
- The complete lack of demonstrated pre-cutoff knowledge is atypical of the claimed reference snapshot.
- The response provides no behavioral evidence supporting the claimed model identity.
- Universal abstention includes numerous high-salience probes dated before the saved May 2026 reference cutoff.
- Because there are no incorrect recall claims, the evidence supports suspicion rather than a highly inconsistent determination.
Texto do modelo extraído literalmente
Este é o texto exato do modelo extraído da resposta externa da API bem-sucedida e fornecido ao juiz. Os cabeçalhos HTTP, a chave da API externa e o envelope completo de resposta do provedor não são armazenados aqui.
```json
{
"answers": [
{
"id": "SR01",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "SR02",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K01",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K02",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K03",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K04",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K05",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K06",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K07",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K08",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K09",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K10",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K11",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K12",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K13",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K14",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K15",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K16",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K17",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K18",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K19",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K20",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K21",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K22",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K23",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K24",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
}
]
}
```Evidência pergunta por pergunta
Todas as questões admitidas são mostradas com a resposta esperada, fonte disponível, base do modelo testado, veredicto semântico e elegibilidade de corte. Perguntas não avaliadas não são abstenções modelo. Uma GUESS ou INFERENCE correta permanece semanticamente correta, mas é excluída da evidência de corte de recordação pura.
Who won Colombia's 2026 presidential runoff election?
Nota do avaliador: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2026 Masters Tournament?
Nota do avaliador: Explicit abstention.
Which party won Hungary's 2026 parliamentary election?
Nota do avaliador: Explicit abstention.
Which instability did the Inouye Solar Telescope provide the first experimental confirmation of in the Sun's photosphere?
Nota do avaliador: Explicit abstention.
Who was declared the winner of Zambia's 2026 presidential election?
Nota do avaliador: Explicit abstention.
Which series won Outstanding Drama Series at the 77th Emmy Awards?
Nota do avaliador: Explicit abstention.
Who clinched the 2025 Formula One World Drivers' Championship at the Abu Dhabi Grand Prix?
Nota do avaliador: Explicit abstention.
Which film won Best Motion Picture — Drama at the 2026 Golden Globes?
Nota do avaliador: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2025 Wimbledon gentlemen's singles title?
Nota do avaliador: Explicit abstention.
Which club won the 2025 UEFA Super Cup?
Nota do avaliador: Explicit abstention.
Which country won the 2026 World Baseball Classic?
Nota do avaliador: Explicit abstention.
Which team won Super Bowl LX?
Nota do avaliador: Explicit abstention.
Which artist won Album of the Year at the 2026 Grammy Awards?
Nota do avaliador: Explicit abstention.
Who won New York City's 2025 mayoral election?
Nota do avaliador: Explicit abstention.
Who received the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize?
Nota do avaliador: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2026 Wimbledon ladies' singles title?
Nota do avaliador: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2026 Australian Open women's singles title?
Nota do avaliador: Explicit abstention.
Which country won the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
Nota do avaliador: Explicit abstention.
Which film won Best Picture at the 98th Academy Awards?
Nota do avaliador: Explicit abstention.
Which team won the 2025 NBA championship?
Nota do avaliador: Explicit abstention.
Which cardinal was elected pope and took the name Leo XIV in the May 2025 conclave?
Nota do avaliador: Explicit abstention.
Which film won the Palme d'Or at the 2026 Cannes Film Festival?
Nota do avaliador: Explicit abstention.
Which team won the 2026 NBA championship?
Nota do avaliador: Explicit abstention.
Which performer won the 2026 Eurovision Song Contest?
Nota do avaliador: Explicit abstention.
Cobertura de perguntas e notas de pesquisa
Perguntas factuais: 24 · Não avaliado pelo juiz: 0
O corte de referência e as citações são fornecidos pelo juiz, não confirmados de forma independente pela plataforma. As notas de pesquisa não penalizam o modelo testado.
Detalhes de reprodutibilidade
MBAJ09XSXC0CSHVAV73EJTBTRQmodel-verification-single-request-v1.4gpt-5.6-solopenai_chatanthropic_messagesERRADO · recuperadoNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recorded20015,654 ms3,702d783ad1531895d72131fa6c7040adf91ec505a5a1cf65146e95e2eb001047f04Benchmark v1.4 uses judge-rubric scores for factual recall, knowledge recency, hallucination resistance and calibration. The overall score is their fixed 37.5/25/25/12.5 weighted aggregation. Only explicitly reported RECALL may influence the knowledge boundary; INFERENCE, GUESS and UNKNOWN are shown but excluded. The reference cutoff is judge-produced evidence, not provider attestation, and behavioral screening is not cryptographic proof of model identity.
Execute uma verificação independente
Teste você mesmo o mesmo endpoint ou navegue em outros relatórios públicos antes de confiar em uma identidade de modelo anunciada.