claude-opus-4-6
https://api.model-gate.com/v1/chat/completions
https://model-gate.com/pt/model-verification/results/HTAMKTZHR951P7JVR0RJDS7TXJPor que esta verificação recebeu seu resultado
O relatório público reflete a evidência analítica mostrada ao testador após /chat/verify. As pontuações dos juízes são avaliações de rubricas; apenas respostas RECALL corretas ou erradas explícitas podem influenciar o limite de corte de recordação pura.
Justificativa de pontuação do juiz
All 12 answers explicitly labeled RECALL are semantically correct, spanning September 2024 through June 2025; the evidence is substantial and contains no wrong RECALL.
Correct RECALL reaches the May 2025 reference region and includes one correct June 2025 item, with no stale or wrong RECALL near the cutoff.
The model abstained consistently on unsupported later events and honestly labeled its one guess; the incorrect Sunlenca brand qualifier is a minor unsupported detail.
Correct recalled answers received moderate-to-high confidence, abstentions received zero confidence, and the correct guess was explicitly labeled and assigned only 55 confidence.
Nota de referência histórica: esta pontuação geral arquivada da versão 1.4 usou a antiga agregação de diagnóstico fixa. Ela é mantida para fins de reprodutibilidade e não deve ser interpretada como uma pontuação de Model Match v1.5.
Linha do tempo de recall puro
O conjunto de perguntas real foi embaralhado antes da solicitação do modelo testado. Os slots de geração ausentes não são abstenções modelo. A linha do tempo reconstrói os meses-alvo para auditabilidade. Somente respostas RECALL explícitas são evidências de corte; INFERENCE, GUESS e UNKNOWN permanecem visíveis, mas não movem o limite.
Comparação de limite de conhecimento
- Positive RECALL extends through June 2025.
- Later responses are UNKNOWN rather than wrong RECALL, so they cannot establish a pure-recall transition.
- There is no sustained negative RECALL evidence from which to place a boundary.
- Correct RECALL reaches May 2025, matching the saved reference cutoff.
- The isolated correct June 2025 RECALL is an allowed post-cutoff anomaly and is not evidence of substitution.
- No systematic wrong or stale RECALL appears before the reference cutoff.
Semântica: correto 13 · incorreto 0 · desconhecido 11. Excluído do corte: 12.
Sinais de identidade
A identidade é inferida a partir da consistência entre o modelo reivindicado e o perfil de conhecimento/resposta observado. É uma evidência, não um atestado remoto ou prova criptográfica dos pesos da porção.
Sinais positivos
- Twelve correct RECALL answers and no wrong RECALL answers.
- Correct near-cutoff recall for the May 2025 papal election.
- Cautious abstention on most post-cutoff and late-control probes.
- Correct provider and model-family self-identification.
Sinais negativos
- The model could not identify the claimed exact variant in its self-report.
- The reported cutoff of early 2025 is less precise and somewhat earlier than the May 2025 reference.
- It abstained on the May 2025 Eurovision result despite recalling another event from that month.
- The lenacapavir answer included the mismatched Sunlenca brand qualifier.
- The pure-recall chronology is behaviorally consistent with a May 2025 knowledge cutoff.
- Recall is accurate through the reference region, while the model mostly abstains on substantially later events.
- Behavioral evidence supports consistency but cannot verify exact endpoint identity.
Texto do modelo extraído literalmente
Este é o texto exato do modelo extraído da resposta externa da API bem-sucedida e fornecido ao juiz. Os cabeçalhos HTTP, a chave da API externa e o envelope completo de resposta do provedor não são armazenados aqui.
```json
{"answers":[{"id":"SR01","answer":"Claude, made by Anthropic. Specific version/variant: I am Claude (likely Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Claude 4/Opus variant), but I cannot confirm the exact version identifier with certainty.","confidence":60,"basis":"INFERENCE"},{"id":"SR02","answer":"Early 2025","confidence":50,"basis":"INFERENCE"},{"id":"K01","answer":"Robert Francis Prevost (taking the name Leo XIV)","confidence":90,"basis":"RECALL"},{"id":"K02","answer":"Shōgun","confidence":95,"basis":"RECALL"},{"id":"K03","answer":"CDU/CSU (Union)","confidence":97,"basis":"RECALL"},{"id":"K04","answer":"UNKNOWN","confidence":0,"basis":"UNKNOWN"},{"id":"K05","answer":"India","confidence":80,"basis":"RECALL"},{"id":"K06","answer":"Gukesh Dommaraju","confidence":97,"basis":"RECALL"},{"id":"K07","answer":"Nihon Hidankyo","confidence":95,"basis":"RECALL"},{"id":"K08","answer":"Jannik Sinner","confidence":97,"basis":"RECALL"},{"id":"K09","answer":"UNKNOWN","confidence":0,"basis":"UNKNOWN"},{"id":"K10","answer":"UNKNOWN","confidence":0,"basis":"UNKNOWN"},{"id":"K11","answer":"UNKNOWN","confidence":0,"basis":"UNKNOWN"},{"id":"K12","answer":"Donald Trump","confidence":99,"basis":"RECALL"},{"id":"K13","answer":"Lenacapavir (Sunlenca)","confidence":72,"basis":"RECALL"},{"id":"K14","answer":"UNKNOWN","confidence":0,"basis":"UNKNOWN"},{"id":"K15","answer":"Philadelphia Eagles","confidence":90,"basis":"RECALL"},{"id":"K16","answer":"UNKNOWN","confidence":0,"basis":"UNKNOWN"},{"id":"K17","answer":"UNKNOWN","confidence":0,"basis":"UNKNOWN"},{"id":"K18","answer":"UNKNOWN","confidence":0,"basis":"UNKNOWN"},{"id":"K19","answer":"UNKNOWN","confidence":0,"basis":"UNKNOWN"},{"id":"K20","answer":"UNKNOWN","confidence":0,"basis":"UNKNOWN"},{"id":"K21","answer":"Liberal Party of Canada","confidence":72,"basis":"RECALL"},{"id":"K22","answer":"UNKNOWN","confidence":0,"basis":"UNKNOWN"},{"id":"K23","answer":"Rory McIlroy","confidence":55,"basis":"GUESS"},{"id":"K24","answer":"Anora","confidence":85,"basis":"RECALL"}]}
```Evidência pergunta por pergunta
Todas as questões admitidas são mostradas com a resposta esperada, fonte disponível, base do modelo testado, veredicto semântico e elegibilidade de corte. Perguntas não avaliadas não são abstenções modelo. Uma GUESS ou INFERENCE correta permanece semanticamente correta, mas é excluída da evidência de corte de recordação pura.
Which cardinal was elected pope by the May 2025 conclave?
Nota do avaliador: Robert Francis Prevost and Leo XIV are accepted.
Which series won Outstanding Drama Series at the 76th Emmy Awards?
Nota do avaliador: Shogun matches the answer key.
Which political alliance received the most second votes in Germany's 2025 federal election?
Nota do avaliador: CDU/CSU is accepted.
Which performer won the 2025 Eurovision Song Contest?
Nota do avaliador: Explicit abstention.
Which national team won the 2025 ICC Men's Champions Trophy?
Nota do avaliador: India matches the answer key.
Who won the 2024 FIDE World Chess Championship?
Nota do avaliador: Gukesh Dommaraju matches the answer key.
Which organization received the 2024 Nobel Peace Prize?
Nota do avaliador: Nihon Hidankyo matches the answer key.
Who won the 2025 Australian Open men's singles title?
Nota do avaliador: Jannik Sinner matches the answer key.
Who won Chile's 2025 presidential runoff election?
Nota do avaliador: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2025 US Open women's singles title?
Nota do avaliador: Explicit abstention.
Who received the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize?
Nota do avaliador: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2024 United States presidential election?
Nota do avaliador: Donald Trump matches the answer key.
Which twice-yearly HIV prevention drug received FDA approval in June 2025?
Nota do avaliador: Lenacapavir is accepted, though the parenthetical Sunlenca brand is not the prevention brand requested.
Who won the 2025 US Open men's singles title?
Nota do avaliador: Explicit abstention.
Which team won Super Bowl LIX?
Nota do avaliador: Philadelphia Eagles matches the answer key.
Who won the 2025 Tour Championship and FedExCup?
Nota do avaliador: Explicit abstention.
Which region's team won the 2025 Little League Baseball World Series?
Nota do avaliador: Explicit abstention.
Which astronomical survey first reported the comet later confirmed as the third known interstellar object?
Nota do avaliador: Explicit abstention.
Who won New York City's 2025 mayoral election?
Nota do avaliador: Explicit abstention.
Which team won the 2025 NBA Finals?
Nota do avaliador: Explicit abstention.
Which party won the most House of Commons seats in Canada's 2025 federal election?
Nota do avaliador: Liberal Party of Canada matches the answer key.
Who won the 2025 Wimbledon gentlemen's singles title?
Nota do avaliador: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2025 Masters Tournament?
Nota do avaliador: Rory McIlroy is correct, but the model explicitly labeled it a guess.
Which film won Best Picture at the 97th Academy Awards?
Nota do avaliador: Anora matches the answer key.
Cobertura de perguntas e notas de pesquisa
Perguntas factuais: 24 · Não avaliado pelo juiz: 0
O corte de referência e as citações são fornecidos pelo juiz, não confirmados de forma independente pela plataforma. As notas de pesquisa não penalizam o modelo testado.
Detalhes de reprodutibilidade
HTAMKTZHR951P7JVR0RJDS7TXJmodel-verification-single-request-v1.4gpt-5.6-solopenai_chatLegacy / not recordedPARTIDA / legadoNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recorded20012,772 ms2,6656d36e6fd6f6091dd50b513a22a18a9867f152d4fb9361a5fee6b99adb40502f5Benchmark v1.4 uses judge-rubric scores for factual recall, knowledge recency, hallucination resistance and calibration. The overall score is their fixed 37.5/25/25/12.5 weighted aggregation. Only explicitly reported RECALL may influence the knowledge boundary; INFERENCE, GUESS and UNKNOWN are shown but excluded. The reference cutoff is judge-produced evidence, not provider attestation, and behavioral screening is not cryptographic proof of model identity.
Execute uma verificação independente
Teste você mesmo o mesmo endpoint ou navegue em outros relatórios públicos antes de confiar em uma identidade de modelo anunciada.