claude-opus-5
https://madclaude.cloud/v1/messages
https://model-gate.com/lv/model-verification/results/MBAJ09XSXC0CSHVAV73EJTBTRQKāpēc šī pārbaude saņēma savu rezultātu?
Publiskais pārskats atspoguļo analītiskos pierādījumus, kas parādīti testētājam pēc /chat/verify. Tiesnešu rezultāti ir rubrikas vērtējumi; tikai skaidras pareizas vai nepareizas ATGĀDINĀŠANAS atbildes var ietekmēt tīrās atsaukšanas robežu.
Tiesneša punktu skaitīšanas pamatojums
No item contains usable RECALL evidence, so the response demonstrates no factual recall.
There is no usable recent RECALL evidence at any point in the tested timeline.
The response consistently abstains and makes no unsupported factual assertions.
Every abstention is labeled UNKNOWN with zero confidence, accurately representing the absence of an answer.
Vēsturiska etalona piezīme: šajā arhivētajā 1.4 versijas kopējā rādītājā tika izmantots iepriekšējais fiksētais diagnostikas apkopojums. Tas tiek saglabāts reproducējamības labad, un to nedrīkst interpretēt kā v1.5 modeļa atbilstības rezultātu.
Tīras atsaukšanas laika skala
Faktiskais jautājumu kopums tika sajaukts pirms pārbaudītā modeļa pieprasījuma. Trūkstošās paaudzes laika nišas nav modeļa atturēšanās. Laika skala rekonstruē to mērķa mēnešus auditējamībai. Tikai skaidras ATGĀDINĀŠANAS atbildes ir galīgs pierādījums; SECINĀJUMI, MINĒJUMI un NEZINĀMS paliek redzami, bet nepārvieto robežu.
Zināšanu robežu salīdzinājums
- No answer was reported with a RECALL basis.
- No positive or negative recall sequence exists from which to infer a transition.
- The May 2026 reference cutoff is known, but the tested response supplies no pure-RECALL behavioral evidence for comparison.
- A cutoff boundary cannot be manufactured from explicit abstentions.
Semantiskais: pareizi 0 · nepareizi 0 · nav zināms 24. Izslēgts no ierobežojuma: 24.
Identitātes signāli
Identitāte tiek secināta no konsekvences starp apgalvoto modeli un novēroto zināšanu/atbilžu profilu. Tas ir pierādījums, nevis attāls apliecinājums vai kriptogrāfisks pierādījums porcijas svaram.
Pozitīvie signāli
- The response is internally consistent and avoids fabrication.
- All required answer IDs are present and recoverable.
Negatīvie signāli
- No factual answer or RECALL evidence was supplied for any of the 24 probes.
- The endpoint's claimed model and API identifier are untrusted self-report and receive no behavioral corroboration.
- The complete lack of demonstrated pre-cutoff knowledge is atypical of the claimed reference snapshot.
- The response provides no behavioral evidence supporting the claimed model identity.
- Universal abstention includes numerous high-salience probes dated before the saved May 2026 reference cutoff.
- Because there are no incorrect recall claims, the evidence supports suspicion rather than a highly inconsistent determination.
Burtiski izvilkts modeļa teksts
Šis ir precīzs modeļa teksts, kas iegūts no veiksmīgas ārējās API atbildes un piegādāts tiesnesim. Šeit netiek glabātas HTTP galvenes, ārējā API atslēga un visa nodrošinātāja atbildes aploksne.
```json
{
"answers": [
{
"id": "SR01",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "SR02",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K01",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K02",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K03",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K04",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K05",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K06",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K07",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K08",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K09",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K10",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K11",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K12",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K13",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K14",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K15",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K16",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K17",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K18",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K19",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K20",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K21",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K22",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K23",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K24",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
}
]
}
```Pierādījumi pēc jautājuma
Visi pieņemtie jautājumi tiek parādīti ar paredzamo atbildi, pieejamo avotu, pārbaudītā modeļa bāzi, semantisko spriedumu un piemērotību robežvērtībām. Jautājumi bez atzīmes nav parauga atturēšanās. Pareizs MINĒJUMS vai SECINĀJUMS paliek pareizs semantiski, bet tiek izslēgts no tīra atsaukšanas ierobežojuma pierādījumiem.
Who won Colombia's 2026 presidential runoff election?
Vērtētāja piezīme: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2026 Masters Tournament?
Vērtētāja piezīme: Explicit abstention.
Which party won Hungary's 2026 parliamentary election?
Vērtētāja piezīme: Explicit abstention.
Which instability did the Inouye Solar Telescope provide the first experimental confirmation of in the Sun's photosphere?
Vērtētāja piezīme: Explicit abstention.
Who was declared the winner of Zambia's 2026 presidential election?
Vērtētāja piezīme: Explicit abstention.
Which series won Outstanding Drama Series at the 77th Emmy Awards?
Vērtētāja piezīme: Explicit abstention.
Who clinched the 2025 Formula One World Drivers' Championship at the Abu Dhabi Grand Prix?
Vērtētāja piezīme: Explicit abstention.
Which film won Best Motion Picture — Drama at the 2026 Golden Globes?
Vērtētāja piezīme: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2025 Wimbledon gentlemen's singles title?
Vērtētāja piezīme: Explicit abstention.
Which club won the 2025 UEFA Super Cup?
Vērtētāja piezīme: Explicit abstention.
Which country won the 2026 World Baseball Classic?
Vērtētāja piezīme: Explicit abstention.
Which team won Super Bowl LX?
Vērtētāja piezīme: Explicit abstention.
Which artist won Album of the Year at the 2026 Grammy Awards?
Vērtētāja piezīme: Explicit abstention.
Who won New York City's 2025 mayoral election?
Vērtētāja piezīme: Explicit abstention.
Who received the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize?
Vērtētāja piezīme: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2026 Wimbledon ladies' singles title?
Vērtētāja piezīme: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2026 Australian Open women's singles title?
Vērtētāja piezīme: Explicit abstention.
Which country won the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
Vērtētāja piezīme: Explicit abstention.
Which film won Best Picture at the 98th Academy Awards?
Vērtētāja piezīme: Explicit abstention.
Which team won the 2025 NBA championship?
Vērtētāja piezīme: Explicit abstention.
Which cardinal was elected pope and took the name Leo XIV in the May 2025 conclave?
Vērtētāja piezīme: Explicit abstention.
Which film won the Palme d'Or at the 2026 Cannes Film Festival?
Vērtētāja piezīme: Explicit abstention.
Which team won the 2026 NBA championship?
Vērtētāja piezīme: Explicit abstention.
Which performer won the 2026 Eurovision Song Contest?
Vērtētāja piezīme: Explicit abstention.
Jautājumu pārklājums un izpētes piezīmes
Faktiski jautājumi: 24 · Tiesnesis nav novērtējis: 0
Atsauces robežvērtības un citātus nodrošina tiesnesis, platforma tos neapstiprina neatkarīgi. Izpētes piezīmes nesoda pārbaudīto modeli.
Reproducējamības detaļas
MBAJ09XSXC0CSHVAV73EJTBTRQmodel-verification-single-request-v1.4gpt-5.6-solopenai_chatanthropic_messagesMISATCH · atgūtaNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recorded20015,654 ms3,702d783ad1531895d72131fa6c7040adf91ec505a5a1cf65146e95e2eb001047f04Benchmark v1.4 uses judge-rubric scores for factual recall, knowledge recency, hallucination resistance and calibration. The overall score is their fixed 37.5/25/25/12.5 weighted aggregation. Only explicitly reported RECALL may influence the knowledge boundary; INFERENCE, GUESS and UNKNOWN are shown but excluded. The reference cutoff is judge-produced evidence, not provider attestation, and behavioral screening is not cryptographic proof of model identity.
Veiciet neatkarīgu verifikāciju
Pārbaudiet to pašu galapunktu pats vai pārlūkojiet citus publiskos pārskatus, pirms paļaujaties uz reklamētā modeļa identitāti.