claude-opus-5
https://madclaude.cloud/v1/messages
https://model-gate.com/fr/model-verification/results/MBAJ09XSXC0CSHVAV73EJTBTRQPourquoi cette vérification a reçu son résultat
Le rapport public reflète les preuves analytiques présentées au testeur après /chat/verify. Les notes des juges sont des évaluations par rubrique ; seules les réponses explicites correctes ou erronées de RECALL peuvent influencer la limite du rappel pur.
Justification de la notation du juge
No item contains usable RECALL evidence, so the response demonstrates no factual recall.
There is no usable recent RECALL evidence at any point in the tested timeline.
The response consistently abstains and makes no unsupported factual assertions.
Every abstention is labeled UNKNOWN with zero confidence, accurately representing the absence of an answer.
Note de référence historique : ce score global v1.4 archivé utilisait l'ancienne agrégation de diagnostic fixe. Il est conservé par souci de reproductibilité et ne doit pas être interprété comme un score de correspondance de modèle v1.5.
Chronologie de pur rappel
L'ensemble de questions réel a été mélangé avant la demande de modèle testé. Les créneaux de génération manquants ne constituent pas des abstentions de modèle. La chronologie reconstitue leurs mois cibles pour l’auditabilité. Seules les réponses explicites de RECALL constituent une preuve de coupure ; INFERENCE, GUESS et UNKNOWN restent visibles mais ne déplacent pas la limite.
Comparaison des seuils de connaissances
- No answer was reported with a RECALL basis.
- No positive or negative recall sequence exists from which to infer a transition.
- The May 2026 reference cutoff is known, but the tested response supplies no pure-RECALL behavioral evidence for comparison.
- A cutoff boundary cannot be manufactured from explicit abstentions.
Sémantique: correct 0 · incorrect 0 · inconnu 24. Exclus du seuil: 24.
Signaux d'identité
L'identité est déduite de la cohérence entre le modèle revendiqué et le profil connaissance/réponse observé. Il s’agit d’une preuve, et non d’une attestation à distance ou d’une preuve cryptographique du poids servi.
Signaux positifs
- The response is internally consistent and avoids fabrication.
- All required answer IDs are present and recoverable.
Signaux négatifs
- No factual answer or RECALL evidence was supplied for any of the 24 probes.
- The endpoint's claimed model and API identifier are untrusted self-report and receive no behavioral corroboration.
- The complete lack of demonstrated pre-cutoff knowledge is atypical of the claimed reference snapshot.
- The response provides no behavioral evidence supporting the claimed model identity.
- Universal abstention includes numerous high-salience probes dated before the saved May 2026 reference cutoff.
- Because there are no incorrect recall claims, the evidence supports suspicion rather than a highly inconsistent determination.
Texte du modèle extrait textuellement
Il s'agit du texte modèle exact extrait de la réponse réussie de l'API externe et fourni au juge. Les en-têtes HTTP, la clé API externe et l'enveloppe de réponse complète du fournisseur ne sont pas stockés ici.
```json
{
"answers": [
{
"id": "SR01",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "SR02",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K01",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K02",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K03",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K04",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K05",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K06",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K07",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K08",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K09",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K10",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K11",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K12",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K13",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K14",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K15",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K16",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K17",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K18",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K19",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K20",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K21",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K22",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K23",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K24",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
}
]
}
```Preuve question par question
Toutes les questions admises sont présentées avec la réponse attendue, la source disponible, la base du modèle testé, le verdict sémantique et le seuil d'éligibilité. Les questions non notées ne constituent pas des abstentions modèles. Une DEVINATION ou UNE INFÉRENCE correcte reste sémantiquement correcte mais est exclue des preuves de coupure de rappel pur.
Who won Colombia's 2026 presidential runoff election?
Note de l’évaluateur: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2026 Masters Tournament?
Note de l’évaluateur: Explicit abstention.
Which party won Hungary's 2026 parliamentary election?
Note de l’évaluateur: Explicit abstention.
Which instability did the Inouye Solar Telescope provide the first experimental confirmation of in the Sun's photosphere?
Note de l’évaluateur: Explicit abstention.
Who was declared the winner of Zambia's 2026 presidential election?
Note de l’évaluateur: Explicit abstention.
Which series won Outstanding Drama Series at the 77th Emmy Awards?
Note de l’évaluateur: Explicit abstention.
Who clinched the 2025 Formula One World Drivers' Championship at the Abu Dhabi Grand Prix?
Note de l’évaluateur: Explicit abstention.
Which film won Best Motion Picture — Drama at the 2026 Golden Globes?
Note de l’évaluateur: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2025 Wimbledon gentlemen's singles title?
Note de l’évaluateur: Explicit abstention.
Which club won the 2025 UEFA Super Cup?
Note de l’évaluateur: Explicit abstention.
Which country won the 2026 World Baseball Classic?
Note de l’évaluateur: Explicit abstention.
Which team won Super Bowl LX?
Note de l’évaluateur: Explicit abstention.
Which artist won Album of the Year at the 2026 Grammy Awards?
Note de l’évaluateur: Explicit abstention.
Who won New York City's 2025 mayoral election?
Note de l’évaluateur: Explicit abstention.
Who received the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize?
Note de l’évaluateur: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2026 Wimbledon ladies' singles title?
Note de l’évaluateur: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2026 Australian Open women's singles title?
Note de l’évaluateur: Explicit abstention.
Which country won the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
Note de l’évaluateur: Explicit abstention.
Which film won Best Picture at the 98th Academy Awards?
Note de l’évaluateur: Explicit abstention.
Which team won the 2025 NBA championship?
Note de l’évaluateur: Explicit abstention.
Which cardinal was elected pope and took the name Leo XIV in the May 2025 conclave?
Note de l’évaluateur: Explicit abstention.
Which film won the Palme d'Or at the 2026 Cannes Film Festival?
Note de l’évaluateur: Explicit abstention.
Which team won the 2026 NBA championship?
Note de l’évaluateur: Explicit abstention.
Which performer won the 2026 Eurovision Song Contest?
Note de l’évaluateur: Explicit abstention.
Couverture des questions et notes de recherche
Questions factuelles: 24 · Non noté par le juge: 0
Les seuils de référence et les citations sont fournis par le juge, non confirmés de manière indépendante par la plateforme. Les notes de recherche ne pénalisent pas le modèle testé.
Détails de reproductibilité
MBAJ09XSXC0CSHVAV73EJTBTRQmodel-verification-single-request-v1.4gpt-5.6-solopenai_chatanthropic_messagesINCOMPATCH · récupéréNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recorded20015,654 ms3,702d783ad1531895d72131fa6c7040adf91ec505a5a1cf65146e95e2eb001047f04Benchmark v1.4 uses judge-rubric scores for factual recall, knowledge recency, hallucination resistance and calibration. The overall score is their fixed 37.5/25/25/12.5 weighted aggregation. Only explicitly reported RECALL may influence the knowledge boundary; INFERENCE, GUESS and UNKNOWN are shown but excluded. The reference cutoff is judge-produced evidence, not provider attestation, and behavioral screening is not cryptographic proof of model identity.
Exécutez une vérification indépendante
Testez vous-même le même point de terminaison ou parcourez d’autres rapports publics avant de vous fier à une identité de modèle annoncée.