claude-opus-5
https://madclaude.cloud/v1/messages
https://model-gate.com/et/model-verification/results/V8Y3ZFEZK23179GX0M3MN6D36FMiks see kontroll oma tulemuse sai?
Avalik aruanne peegeldab analüütilisi tõendeid, mis kuvatakse testijale pärast funktsiooni /chat/verify. Kohtuniku hinded on rubriigi hinnangud; ainult selgesõnalised õiged või valed RECALL vastused võivad mõjutada puhta meenutamise piiri.
Kohtuniku punktiarvestuse põhjendus
No factual probe contains usable RECALL evidence or a correct demonstrated answer.
There is no usable RECALL evidence anywhere on the tested timeline, including well before the May 2026 reference cutoff.
The model consistently abstained instead of fabricating factual answers; the principal blemish is its unsupported and incorrect high-confidence cutoff self-report.
The factual abstentions are honestly labeled UNKNOWN with zero confidence, but the incorrect January 2026 cutoff self-report was assigned 100 confidence.
Mudeli sobivuse võrdlusnäitajad ei anna nende nelja diagnostilise skoori mudeli identiteediks keskmist. Pealkiri Model Match skoor pärineb kohtuniku identiteedi rubriigist; Hallutsinatsiooniresistentsus ja kalibreerimine võivad jääda kõrgeks isegi siis, kui väidetava mudeli vaste on väga madal.
Puhas meeldetuletuse ajaskaala
Tegelik küsimuste komplekt segati enne testitud mudeli päringut. Puuduvad põlvkonna pesad ei ole mudeli erapooletuks jääjad. Ajaskaalal rekonstrueeritakse nende auditeeritavuse sihtkuud. Ainult selgesõnalised RECALL vastused on lõplikud tõendid; JÄRELDUS, ARVASTAMINE ja TUNDMATU jäävad nähtavaks, kuid ei liiguta piiri.
Teadmiste piiride võrdlus
- All 24 factual probes were explicit UNKNOWN responses.
- No RECALL item exists from which to infer a chronological transition.
- Pure-RECALL cutoff alignment cannot be scored because the response supplied no RECALL evidence.
- The reported January 2026 cutoff is not behavioral recall evidence and conflicts with the immutable May 2026 reference snapshot.
Semantiline: õige 0 · vale 0 · teadmata 24. Väljaarvatud: 24.
Identiteedi signaalid
Identiteet tuletatakse väidetava mudeli ja vaadeldud teadmiste/vastuste profiili vahelisest kooskõlast. See on tõend, mitte kaugtõend või krüptograafiline tõend serveerimiskaalude kohta.
Positiivsed signaalid
- The self-reported model name and provider match the claim, but self-report is weak identity evidence.
- The response avoided fabricated factual answers.
Negatiivsed signaalid
- Near-universal abstention includes all expected pre-cutoff knowledge probes.
- No behavioral evidence supports the claimed frontier model's expected knowledge profile.
- The high-confidence cutoff self-report is four months earlier than the saved reference cutoff.
Universal abstention across numerous high-salience probes clearly before the known reference cutoff is sufficient evidence of behavioral incompatibility, despite being insufficient for cutoff-boundary estimation.
- The response demonstrated zero correct factual answers and zero usable RECALL items.
- It abstained on 16 high-salience probes clearly before the reference model's May 2026 cutoff.
- It also abstained on both probes from the reference cutoff month.
- Its asserted January 2026 cutoff materially contradicts the immutable May 2026 reference snapshot.
Sõnasõnaliselt ekstraheeritud mudelitekst
See on täpne mudeltekst, mis on eraldatud edukast välisest API vastusest ja edastatud kohtunikule. Siin ei salvestata HTTP-päiseid, välist API-võtit ja kogu pakkuja vastuse ümbrikut.
```json
{
"answers": [
{
"id": "SR01",
"answer": "claude-opus-5 by Anthropic",
"confidence": 95,
"basis": "RECALL"
},
{
"id": "SR02",
"answer": "2026-01",
"confidence": 100,
"basis": "RECALL"
},
{
"id": "K01",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K02",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K03",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K04",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K05",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K06",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K07",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K08",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K09",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K10",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K11",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K12",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K13",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K14",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K15",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K16",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K17",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K18",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K19",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K20",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K21",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K22",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K23",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K24",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
}
]
}
```Küsimuste kaupa tõendid
Kõik vastuvõetud küsimused kuvatakse koos eeldatava vastuse, saadaoleva allika, testitud mudeli aluse, semantilise otsuse ja piiride sobilikkusega. Hindamata küsimused ei ole näidishoidjad. Õige ARVATUS või JÄRELDUS jääb semantiliselt õigeks, kuid on välja jäetud puhta meeldetuletuse piirtõendite hulgast.
Which film won Best Picture at the 98th Academy Awards?
Hindaja märkus: Explicit abstention.
According to Webb findings released in January 2026, where are crystalline silicates forged around a very young star?
Hindaja märkus: Explicit abstention.
Which team won Super Bowl LX?
Hindaja märkus: Explicit abstention.
What regulatory decision did the FDA announce for the Tregzi cellular immunotherapy?
Hindaja märkus: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2026 Wimbledon men's singles title?
Hindaja märkus: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2025 Tour Championship and FedExCup?
Hindaja märkus: Explicit abstention.
Which performer won the 2026 Eurovision Song Contest?
Hindaja märkus: Explicit abstention.
Which team won the 2025 NBA Finals?
Hindaja märkus: Explicit abstention.
Which country won the 2026 World Baseball Classic?
Hindaja märkus: Explicit abstention.
Which team won the 2026 NBA Finals?
Hindaja märkus: Explicit abstention.
Who won New York City's 2025 mayoral election?
Hindaja märkus: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2026 Australian Open women's singles title?
Hindaja märkus: Explicit abstention.
Which club won the 2026 UEFA Super Cup?
Hindaja märkus: Explicit abstention.
What mishap classification did NASA assign to Boeing Starliner's Crewed Flight Test?
Hindaja märkus: Explicit abstention.
Which country won the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
Hindaja märkus: Explicit abstention.
Which club won the 2026 UEFA Champions League final?
Hindaja märkus: Explicit abstention.
Which country won the 2026 Little League Baseball World Series?
Hindaja märkus: Explicit abstention.
Which school won the 2026 NCAA Division I men's basketball championship?
Hindaja märkus: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2026 Masters Tournament?
Hindaja märkus: Explicit abstention.
Who received the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize?
Hindaja märkus: Explicit abstention.
Who clinched the 2025 Formula One World Drivers' Championship?
Hindaja märkus: Explicit abstention.
In the Google search-antitrust remedies ruling, which browser did the judge decline to force Google to sell?
Hindaja märkus: Explicit abstention.
Which performer won the 2025 Eurovision Song Contest?
Hindaja märkus: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2025 Wimbledon gentlemen's singles title?
Hindaja märkus: Explicit abstention.
Küsimuste katvus ja uurimismärkmed
Faktilised küsimused: 24 · Ei hinda kohtunik: 0
Viitepiirangu ja tsitaadid esitab kohtunik, platvorm ei ole seda iseseisvalt kinnitanud. Uurimismärkmed ei karista testitud mudelit.
Reprodutseeritavuse üksikasjad
V8Y3ZFEZK23179GX0M3MN6D36Fmodel-verification-single-request-v1.5gpt-5.6-solopenai_chatanthropic_messagesMISMATCH · taastunudNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recorded20019,443 ms3,6562989988b859c9bb90c50291bd34b6ed7423cf3b8c28c3d3915f4f245e99aaaebBenchmark v1.5 uses the judge's Model Match Score as the main Verification score. Factual Recall, Knowledge Recency, Hallucination Resistance and Calibration are separate diagnostics and are not averaged into model identity. Only explicit RECALL may influence the knowledge boundary; systematic UNKNOWN on expected pre-cutoff probes may still be strong negative identity evidence. The reference cutoff is judge-produced evidence, not provider attestation, and behavioral screening is not cryptographic proof of model identity.
Käivitage sõltumatu kinnitus
Testige sama lõpp-punkti ise või sirvige teisi avalikke aruandeid, enne kui tuginete reklaamitud mudeliidentiteedile.