Offentlig AI-model verifikationsrapport
claude-opus-5
https://madclaude.cloud/v1/messages
Model Match score8/100
HIGHLY_INCONSISTENT98% vurdering tillid
Bevis: SUFFICIENTPermanent rapport
https://model-gate.com/da/model-verification/results/V8Y3ZFEZK23179GX0M3MN6D36FBedømmerens analyse
Hvorfor denne verifikation modtog sit resultat
Den offentlige rapport afspejler de analytiske beviser, der er vist for testeren efter /chat/verify. Dommerscore er rubrikvurderinger; kun eksplicitte korrekte eller forkerte RECALL-svar kan påvirke grænsen for ren genkaldelse.
Adfærdsdiagnostik
4 diagnostikBegrundelse for dommerscoring
No factual probe contains usable RECALL evidence or a correct demonstrated answer.
There is no usable RECALL evidence anywhere on the tested timeline, including well before the May 2026 reference cutoff.
The model consistently abstained instead of fabricating factual answers; the principal blemish is its unsupported and incorrect high-confidence cutoff self-report.
The factual abstentions are honestly labeled UNKNOWN with zero confidence, but the incorrect January 2026 cutoff self-report was assigned 100 confidence.
Model-match benchmarks giver ikke et gennemsnit af disse fire diagnostiske scores til modelidentitet. Overskriften Model Match-score kommer fra dommeridentitetsrubrikken; Hallucinationsmodstand og kalibrering kan forblive høj, selv når den påståede modelmatch er meget lav.
Tidlige beviser
0 GENKALD sonderTidslinje for ren genkaldelse
Selve spørgsmålssættet blev blandet før anmodningen om testet model. Manglende generationspladser er ikke modelundladelser. Tidslinjen rekonstruerer deres målmåneder for auditabilitet. Kun eksplicitte RECALL-svar er afskæringsbeviser; INFERENCE, GÆT og UKENDT forbliver synlige, men flytter ikke grænsen.
2025-05? K23UNKNOWN
2025-06? K08UNKNOWN
2025-07? K24UNKNOWN
2025-08? K06UNKNOWN
2025-09? K22UNKNOWN
2025-10? K20UNKNOWN
2025-11? K11UNKNOWN
2025-12? K21UNKNOWN
2026-01? K02UNKNOWN? K12UNKNOWN
2026-02? K03UNKNOWN? K14UNKNOWN
2026-03? K01UNKNOWN? K09UNKNOWN
2026-04? K18UNKNOWN? K19UNKNOWN
2026-05? K07UNKNOWN? K16UNKNOWN
2026-06? K04UNKNOWN? K10UNKNOWN
2026-07? K05UNKNOWN? K15UNKNOWN
2026-08? K13UNKNOWN? K17UNKNOWN
✓ korrekt RECALL✕ forkert tilbagekaldelse~ INFERENCE≈ GUESS? UNKNOWN
0RECALL
0INFERENCE
0GUESS
24UNKNOWN
0korrekt RECALL
0forkert tilbagekaldelse
Tidsmæssig sammenligning
UNKNOWNViden cutoff sammenligning
Referenceafskæring2026-05OFFICIAL_WEB · 99%
Senest understøttede RECALL—0 kvalificerede RECALL-svar
Observeret grænseUtilstrækkelig RECALL-bevisINSUFFICIENT_RECALL_EVIDENCE
AfskæringsjusteringUNKNOWN0% sikkerhed
Bedømmerens noter
- All 24 factual probes were explicit UNKNOWN responses.
- No RECALL item exists from which to infer a chronological transition.
- Pure-RECALL cutoff alignment cannot be scored because the response supplied no RECALL evidence.
- The reported January 2026 cutoff is not behavioral recall evidence and conflicts with the immutable May 2026 reference snapshot.
Referenceafskæringskilder
Semantisk: korrekt 0 · forkert 0 · ukendt 24. Udelukket fra cutoff: 24.
Adfærdsidentitet
HIGHLY_INCONSISTENT · 98%Identitetssignaler
Identitet udledes af sammenhæng mellem den påståede model og den observerede viden/svar-profil. Det er bevis, ikke fjernattest eller kryptografisk bevis for serveringsvægtene.
Positive signaler
- The self-reported model name and provider match the claim, but self-report is weak identity evidence.
- The response avoided fabricated factual answers.
Negative signaler
- Near-universal abstention includes all expected pre-cutoff knowledge probes.
- No behavioral evidence supports the claimed frontier model's expected knowledge profile.
- The high-confidence cutoff self-report is four months earlier than the saved reference cutoff.
Bevis tilstrækkelig: SUFFICIENT
Universal abstention across numerous high-salience probes clearly before the known reference cutoff is sufficient evidence of behavioral incompatibility, despite being insufficient for cutoff-boundary estimation.
Begrundelse for dommerens identitet
- The response demonstrated zero correct factual answers and zero usable RECALL items.
- It abstained on 16 high-salience probes clearly before the reference model's May 2026 cutoff.
- It also abstained on both probes from the reference cutoff month.
- Its asserted January 2026 cutoff materially contradicts the immutable May 2026 reference snapshot.
Testet model respons
Ordret uddraget modeltekst
Udgivet af testers tilvalg
Dette er den nøjagtige modeltekst, der er udtrukket fra det vellykkede eksterne API-svar og leveret til dommeren. HTTP-headere, den eksterne API-nøgle og den komplette udbyders svarkonvolut gemmes ikke her.
```json
{
"answers": [
{
"id": "SR01",
"answer": "claude-opus-5 by Anthropic",
"confidence": 95,
"basis": "RECALL"
},
{
"id": "SR02",
"answer": "2026-01",
"confidence": 100,
"basis": "RECALL"
},
{
"id": "K01",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K02",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K03",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K04",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K05",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K06",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K07",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K08",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K09",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K10",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K11",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K12",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K13",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K14",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K15",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K16",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K17",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K18",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K19",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K20",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K21",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K22",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K23",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K24",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
}
]
}
```Komplet benchmarkliste
Spørgsmål-for-spørgsmål beviser
Alle godkendte spørgsmål vises med det forventede svar, tilgængelig kilde, testmodelgrundlag, semantisk dom og berettigelse til cutoff. Spørgsmål uden karakter er ikke modelundladelser. Et korrekt GÆT eller INFERENCE forbliver korrekt semantisk, men er udelukket fra ren-recall cutoff-bevis.
?K01UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring
Which film won Best Picture at the 98th Academy Awards?
Forventet svarOne Battle After AnotherSource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
?K02UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring
According to Webb findings released in January 2026, where are crystalline silicates forged around a very young star?
Forventet svarIn the hot inner part of its surrounding diskSource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
?K03UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring
Which team won Super Bowl LX?
Forventet svarSeattle SeahawksSource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
?K04UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring
What regulatory decision did the FDA announce for the Tregzi cellular immunotherapy?
Forventet svarIt approved TregziSource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
?K05UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring
Who won the 2026 Wimbledon men's singles title?
Forventet svarJannik SinnerSource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
?K06UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring
Who won the 2025 Tour Championship and FedExCup?
Forventet svarTommy FleetwoodSource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
?K07UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring
Which performer won the 2026 Eurovision Song Contest?
Forventet svarDARASource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
?K08UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring
Which team won the 2025 NBA Finals?
Forventet svarOklahoma City ThunderSource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
?K09UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring
Which country won the 2026 World Baseball Classic?
Forventet svarVenezuelaSource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
?K10UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring
Which team won the 2026 NBA Finals?
Forventet svarNew York KnicksSource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
?K11UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring
Who won New York City's 2025 mayoral election?
Forventet svarZohran MamdaniSource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
?K12UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring
Who won the 2026 Australian Open women's singles title?
Forventet svarElena RybakinaSource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
?K13UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring
Which club won the 2026 UEFA Super Cup?
Forventet svarParis Saint-GermainSource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
?K14UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring
What mishap classification did NASA assign to Boeing Starliner's Crewed Flight Test?
Forventet svarType A mishapSource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
?K15UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring
Which country won the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
Forventet svarSpainSource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
?K16UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring
Which club won the 2026 UEFA Champions League final?
Forventet svarParis Saint-GermainSource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
?K17UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring
Which country won the 2026 Little League Baseball World Series?
Forventet svarCuraçaoSource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
?K18UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring
Which school won the 2026 NCAA Division I men's basketball championship?
Forventet svarMichiganSource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
?K19UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring
Who won the 2026 Masters Tournament?
Forventet svarRory McIlroySource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
?K20UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring
Who received the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize?
Forventet svarMaría Corina MachadoSource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
?K21UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring
Who clinched the 2025 Formula One World Drivers' Championship?
Forventet svarLando NorrisSource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
?K22UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring
In the Google search-antitrust remedies ruling, which browser did the judge decline to force Google to sell?
Forventet svarChromeSource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
?K23UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring
Which performer won the 2025 Eurovision Song Contest?
Forventet svarJJSource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
?K24UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring
Who won the 2025 Wimbledon gentlemen's singles title?
Forventet svarJannik SinnerSource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
Spørgsmålsdækning og forskningsnotater
Faktiske spørgsmål: 24 · Ikke bedømt af dommer: 0
Referenceafskæring og citater leveres af dommeren, ikke uafhængigt bekræftet af platformen. Forskningsnotater straffer ikke den testede model.
Kør metadata
Reproducerbarhedsdetaljer
Kørsels-ID
V8Y3ZFEZK23179GX0M3MN6D36FBenchmark
model-verification-single-request-v1.5Bedømmelsesmodel
gpt-5.6-solAnmodet protokol
openai_chatRegistreret svarskema
anthropic_messagesProtokolkompatibilitet
MISMATCH · genvundetModeloutput
Not recordedInputtokens
Not recordedOutputtokens
Not recordedAfslutningsårsag
Not recordedHTTP-status
200Ekstern latenstid
19,443 msSvarbytes
3,656SHA-256
2989988b859c9bb90c50291bd34b6ed7423cf3b8c28c3d3915f4f245e99aaaebVigtig begrænsning
Benchmark v1.5 uses the judge's Model Match Score as the main Verification score. Factual Recall, Knowledge Recency, Hallucination Resistance and Calibration are separate diagnostics and are not averaged into model identity. Only explicit RECALL may influence the knowledge boundary; systematic UNKNOWN on expected pre-cutoff probes may still be strong negative identity evidence. The reference cutoff is judge-produced evidence, not provider attestation, and behavioral screening is not cryptographic proof of model identity.
Kør en uafhængig verifikation
Test det samme slutpunkt selv, eller gennemse andre offentlige rapporter, før du stoler på en annonceret modelidentitet.