claude-opus-5
https://madclaude.cloud/v1/messages
https://model-gate.com/da/model-verification/results/MBAJ09XSXC0CSHVAV73EJTBTRQHvorfor denne verifikation modtog sit resultat
Den offentlige rapport afspejler de analytiske beviser, der er vist for testeren efter /chat/verify. Dommerscore er rubrikvurderinger; kun eksplicitte korrekte eller forkerte RECALL-svar kan påvirke grænsen for ren genkaldelse.
Begrundelse for dommerscoring
No item contains usable RECALL evidence, so the response demonstrates no factual recall.
There is no usable recent RECALL evidence at any point in the tested timeline.
The response consistently abstains and makes no unsupported factual assertions.
Every abstention is labeled UNKNOWN with zero confidence, accurately representing the absence of an answer.
Historisk benchmarknote: denne arkiverede v1.4 samlede score brugte den tidligere faste diagnostiske aggregering. Det bibeholdes for reproducerbarhed og må ikke tolkes som en v1.5 Model Match-score.
Tidslinje for ren genkaldelse
Selve spørgsmålssættet blev blandet før anmodningen om testet model. Manglende generationspladser er ikke modelundladelser. Tidslinjen rekonstruerer deres målmåneder for auditabilitet. Kun eksplicitte RECALL-svar er afskæringsbeviser; INFERENCE, GÆT og UKENDT forbliver synlige, men flytter ikke grænsen.
Viden cutoff sammenligning
- No answer was reported with a RECALL basis.
- No positive or negative recall sequence exists from which to infer a transition.
- The May 2026 reference cutoff is known, but the tested response supplies no pure-RECALL behavioral evidence for comparison.
- A cutoff boundary cannot be manufactured from explicit abstentions.
Semantisk: korrekt 0 · forkert 0 · ukendt 24. Udelukket fra cutoff: 24.
Identitetssignaler
Identitet udledes af sammenhæng mellem den påståede model og den observerede viden/svar-profil. Det er bevis, ikke fjernattest eller kryptografisk bevis for serveringsvægtene.
Positive signaler
- The response is internally consistent and avoids fabrication.
- All required answer IDs are present and recoverable.
Negative signaler
- No factual answer or RECALL evidence was supplied for any of the 24 probes.
- The endpoint's claimed model and API identifier are untrusted self-report and receive no behavioral corroboration.
- The complete lack of demonstrated pre-cutoff knowledge is atypical of the claimed reference snapshot.
- The response provides no behavioral evidence supporting the claimed model identity.
- Universal abstention includes numerous high-salience probes dated before the saved May 2026 reference cutoff.
- Because there are no incorrect recall claims, the evidence supports suspicion rather than a highly inconsistent determination.
Ordret uddraget modeltekst
Dette er den nøjagtige modeltekst, der er udtrukket fra det vellykkede eksterne API-svar og leveret til dommeren. HTTP-headere, den eksterne API-nøgle og den komplette udbyders svarkonvolut gemmes ikke her.
```json
{
"answers": [
{
"id": "SR01",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "SR02",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K01",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K02",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K03",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K04",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K05",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K06",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K07",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K08",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K09",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K10",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K11",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K12",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K13",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K14",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K15",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K16",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K17",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K18",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K19",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K20",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K21",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K22",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K23",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K24",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
}
]
}
```Spørgsmål-for-spørgsmål beviser
Alle godkendte spørgsmål vises med det forventede svar, tilgængelig kilde, testmodelgrundlag, semantisk dom og berettigelse til cutoff. Spørgsmål uden karakter er ikke modelundladelser. Et korrekt GÆT eller INFERENCE forbliver korrekt semantisk, men er udelukket fra ren-recall cutoff-bevis.
Who won Colombia's 2026 presidential runoff election?
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2026 Masters Tournament?
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
Which party won Hungary's 2026 parliamentary election?
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
Which instability did the Inouye Solar Telescope provide the first experimental confirmation of in the Sun's photosphere?
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
Who was declared the winner of Zambia's 2026 presidential election?
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
Which series won Outstanding Drama Series at the 77th Emmy Awards?
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
Who clinched the 2025 Formula One World Drivers' Championship at the Abu Dhabi Grand Prix?
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
Which film won Best Motion Picture — Drama at the 2026 Golden Globes?
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2025 Wimbledon gentlemen's singles title?
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
Which club won the 2025 UEFA Super Cup?
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
Which country won the 2026 World Baseball Classic?
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
Which team won Super Bowl LX?
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
Which artist won Album of the Year at the 2026 Grammy Awards?
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
Who won New York City's 2025 mayoral election?
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
Who received the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize?
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2026 Wimbledon ladies' singles title?
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2026 Australian Open women's singles title?
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
Which country won the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
Which film won Best Picture at the 98th Academy Awards?
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
Which team won the 2025 NBA championship?
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
Which cardinal was elected pope and took the name Leo XIV in the May 2025 conclave?
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
Which film won the Palme d'Or at the 2026 Cannes Film Festival?
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
Which team won the 2026 NBA championship?
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
Which performer won the 2026 Eurovision Song Contest?
Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.
Spørgsmålsdækning og forskningsnotater
Faktiske spørgsmål: 24 · Ikke bedømt af dommer: 0
Referenceafskæring og citater leveres af dommeren, ikke uafhængigt bekræftet af platformen. Forskningsnotater straffer ikke den testede model.
Reproducerbarhedsdetaljer
MBAJ09XSXC0CSHVAV73EJTBTRQmodel-verification-single-request-v1.4gpt-5.6-solopenai_chatanthropic_messagesMISMATCH · genvundetNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recorded20015,654 ms3,702d783ad1531895d72131fa6c7040adf91ec505a5a1cf65146e95e2eb001047f04Benchmark v1.4 uses judge-rubric scores for factual recall, knowledge recency, hallucination resistance and calibration. The overall score is their fixed 37.5/25/25/12.5 weighted aggregation. Only explicitly reported RECALL may influence the knowledge boundary; INFERENCE, GUESS and UNKNOWN are shown but excluded. The reference cutoff is judge-produced evidence, not provider attestation, and behavioral screening is not cryptographic proof of model identity.
Kør en uafhængig verifikation
Test det samme slutpunkt selv, eller gennemse andre offentlige rapporter, før du stoler på en annonceret modelidentitet.