← Offentligt verifikationsregistermodel-verification-single-request-v1.4
Offentlig AI-model verifikationsrapport

claude-opus-5

https://madclaude.cloud/v1/messages

openai_chatgpt-5.6-solSep 8, 2026 14:03 UTC
Ældre kvalitetsscore38/100
SUSPICIOUS65% vurdering tillid
Permanent rapporthttps://model-gate.com/da/model-verification/results/MBAJ09XSXC0CSHVAV73EJTBTRQ
Telegram ↗X ↗
Faktisk tilbagekaldelse0
Vidensaktualitet0
Hallucinationsmodstand100
Kalibrering100
Påstået modelclaude-opus-5
Dommerbesluttet modelClaude Opus 5Anthropic
Slutpunktsværtmadclaude.cloud
Ekstern responsmodelfeltclaude-opus-5
Bedømmerens analyse

Hvorfor denne verifikation modtog sit resultat

Den offentlige rapport afspejler de analytiske beviser, der er vist for testeren efter /chat/verify. Dommerscore er rubrikvurderinger; kun eksplicitte korrekte eller forkerte RECALL-svar kan påvirke grænsen for ren genkaldelse.

Adfærdsdiagnostik

Begrundelse for dommerscoring

4 diagnostik
Faktisk tilbagekaldelse0/100

No item contains usable RECALL evidence, so the response demonstrates no factual recall.

Vidensaktualitet0/100

There is no usable recent RECALL evidence at any point in the tested timeline.

Hallucinationsmodstand100/100

The response consistently abstains and makes no unsupported factual assertions.

Kalibrering100/100

Every abstention is labeled UNKNOWN with zero confidence, accurately representing the absence of an answer.

Historisk benchmarknote: denne arkiverede v1.4 samlede score brugte den tidligere faste diagnostiske aggregering. Det bibeholdes for reproducerbarhed og må ikke tolkes som en v1.5 Model Match-score.

Tidlige beviser

Tidslinje for ren genkaldelse

0 GENKALD sonder

Selve spørgsmålssættet blev blandet før anmodningen om testet model. Manglende generationspladser er ikke modelundladelser. Tidslinjen rekonstruerer deres målmåneder for auditabilitet. Kun eksplicitte RECALL-svar er afskæringsbeviser; INFERENCE, GÆT og UKENDT forbliver synlige, men flytter ikke grænsen.

2025-05? K21UNKNOWN
2025-06? K20UNKNOWN
2025-07? K09UNKNOWN
2025-08? K10UNKNOWN
2025-09? K06UNKNOWN
2025-10? K15UNKNOWN
2025-11? K14UNKNOWN
2025-12? K07UNKNOWN
2026-01? K08UNKNOWN? K17UNKNOWN
2026-02? K12UNKNOWN? K13UNKNOWN
2026-03? K11UNKNOWN? K19UNKNOWN
2026-04? K02UNKNOWN? K03UNKNOWN
2026-05? K22UNKNOWN? K24UNKNOWN
2026-06? K01UNKNOWN? K23UNKNOWN
2026-07? K16UNKNOWN? K18UNKNOWN
2026-08? K04UNKNOWN? K05UNKNOWN
✓ korrekt RECALL✕ forkert tilbagekaldelse~ INFERENCE≈ GUESS? UNKNOWN
0RECALL
0INFERENCE
0GUESS
24UNKNOWN
0korrekt RECALL
0forkert tilbagekaldelse
Tidsmæssig sammenligning

Viden cutoff sammenligning

UNKNOWN
Referenceafskæring2026-05OFFICIAL_WEB · 100%
Senest understøttede RECALL—0 kvalificerede RECALL-svar
Observeret grænseUtilstrækkelig RECALL-bevisINSUFFICIENT_RECALL_EVIDENCE
AfskæringsjusteringUNKNOWN0% sikkerhed
Bedømmerens noter
  • No answer was reported with a RECALL basis.
  • No positive or negative recall sequence exists from which to infer a transition.
  • The May 2026 reference cutoff is known, but the tested response supplies no pure-RECALL behavioral evidence for comparison.
  • A cutoff boundary cannot be manufactured from explicit abstentions.

Semantisk: korrekt 0 · forkert 0 · ukendt 24. Udelukket fra cutoff: 24.

Adfærdsidentitet

Identitetssignaler

SUSPICIOUS · 65%

Identitet udledes af sammenhæng mellem den påståede model og den observerede viden/svar-profil. Det er bevis, ikke fjernattest eller kryptografisk bevis for serveringsvægtene.

Positive signaler

  • The response is internally consistent and avoids fabrication.
  • All required answer IDs are present and recoverable.

Negative signaler

  • No factual answer or RECALL evidence was supplied for any of the 24 probes.
  • The endpoint's claimed model and API identifier are untrusted self-report and receive no behavioral corroboration.
  • The complete lack of demonstrated pre-cutoff knowledge is atypical of the claimed reference snapshot.
Begrundelse for dommerens identitet
  • The response provides no behavioral evidence supporting the claimed model identity.
  • Universal abstention includes numerous high-salience probes dated before the saved May 2026 reference cutoff.
  • Because there are no incorrect recall claims, the evidence supports suspicion rather than a highly inconsistent determination.
Testet model respons

Ordret uddraget modeltekst

Udgivet af testers tilvalg

Dette er den nøjagtige modeltekst, der er udtrukket fra det vellykkede eksterne API-svar og leveret til dommeren. HTTP-headere, den eksterne API-nøgle og den komplette udbyders svarkonvolut gemmes ikke her.

```json
{
  "answers": [
    {
      "id": "SR01",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "SR02",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K01",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K02",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K03",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K04",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K05",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K06",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K07",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K08",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K09",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K10",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K11",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K12",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K13",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K14",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K15",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K16",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K17",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K18",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K19",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K20",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K21",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K22",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K23",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K24",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    }
  ]
}
```
Komplet benchmarkliste

Spørgsmål-for-spørgsmål beviser

Alle godkendte spørgsmål vises med det forventede svar, tilgængelig kilde, testmodelgrundlag, semantisk dom og berettigelse til cutoff. Spørgsmål uden karakter er ikke modelundladelser. Et korrekt GÆT eller INFERENCE forbliver korrekt semantisk, men er udelukket fra ren-recall cutoff-bevis.

?K01UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring

Who won Colombia's 2026 presidential runoff election?

Forventet svarAbelardo de la EspriellaSource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%

Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.

?K02UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring

Who won the 2026 Masters Tournament?

Forventet svarRory McIlroySource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%

Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.

?K03UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring

Which party won Hungary's 2026 parliamentary election?

Forventet svarTisza PartySource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%

Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.

?K04UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring

Which instability did the Inouye Solar Telescope provide the first experimental confirmation of in the Sun's photosphere?

Forventet svarKelvin-Helmholtz instabilitySource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%

Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.

?K05UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring

Who was declared the winner of Zambia's 2026 presidential election?

Forventet svarHakainde HichilemaSource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%

Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.

?K06UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring

Which series won Outstanding Drama Series at the 77th Emmy Awards?

Forventet svarThe PittSource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%

Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.

?K07UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring

Who clinched the 2025 Formula One World Drivers' Championship at the Abu Dhabi Grand Prix?

Forventet svarLando NorrisSource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%

Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.

?K08UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring

Which film won Best Motion Picture — Drama at the 2026 Golden Globes?

Forventet svarHamnetSource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%

Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.

?K09UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring

Who won the 2025 Wimbledon gentlemen's singles title?

Forventet svarJannik SinnerSource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%

Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.

?K10UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring

Which club won the 2025 UEFA Super Cup?

Forventet svarParis Saint-GermainSource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%

Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.

?K11UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring

Which country won the 2026 World Baseball Classic?

Forventet svarVenezuelaSource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%

Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.

?K12UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring

Which team won Super Bowl LX?

Forventet svarSeattle SeahawksSource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%

Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.

?K13UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring

Which artist won Album of the Year at the 2026 Grammy Awards?

Forventet svarBad BunnySource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%

Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.

?K14UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring

Who won New York City's 2025 mayoral election?

Forventet svarZohran MamdaniSource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%

Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.

?K15UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring

Who received the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize?

Forventet svarMaria Corina MachadoSource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%

Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.

?K16UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring

Who won the 2026 Wimbledon ladies' singles title?

Forventet svarLinda NoskovaSource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%

Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.

?K17UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring

Who won the 2026 Australian Open women's singles title?

Forventet svarElena RybakinaSource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%

Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.

?K18UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring

Which country won the 2026 FIFA World Cup?

Forventet svarSpainSource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%

Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.

?K19UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring

Which film won Best Picture at the 98th Academy Awards?

Forventet svarOne Battle After AnotherSource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%

Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.

?K20UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring

Which team won the 2025 NBA championship?

Forventet svarOklahoma City ThunderSource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%

Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.

?K21UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring

Which cardinal was elected pope and took the name Leo XIV in the May 2025 conclave?

Forventet svarRobert Francis PrevostSource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%

Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.

?K22UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring

Which film won the Palme d'Or at the 2026 Cannes Film Festival?

Forventet svarFjordSource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%

Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.

?K23UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring

Which team won the 2026 NBA championship?

Forventet svarNew York KnicksSource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%

Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.

?K24UNKNOWNudelukket fra afskæring

Which performer won the 2026 Eurovision Song Contest?

Forventet svarDARASource ↗
Testet model svarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Bedømmerens vurdering: UNKNOWNRapporteret tillid: 0%

Bedømmerens note: Explicit abstention.

Spørgsmålsdækning og forskningsnotater

Faktiske spørgsmål: 24 · Ikke bedømt af dommer: 0

Referenceafskæring og citater leveres af dommeren, ikke uafhængigt bekræftet af platformen. Forskningsnotater straffer ikke den testede model.

Kør metadata

Reproducerbarhedsdetaljer

Kørsels-IDMBAJ09XSXC0CSHVAV73EJTBTRQ
Benchmarkmodel-verification-single-request-v1.4
Bedømmelsesmodelgpt-5.6-sol
Anmodet protokolopenai_chat
Registreret svarskemaanthropic_messages
ProtokolkompatibilitetMISMATCH · genvundet
ModeloutputNot recorded
InputtokensNot recorded
OutputtokensNot recorded
AfslutningsårsagNot recorded
HTTP-status200
Ekstern latenstid15,654 ms
Svarbytes3,702
SHA-256d783ad1531895d72131fa6c7040adf91ec505a5a1cf65146e95e2eb001047f04
Vigtig begrænsning

Benchmark v1.4 uses judge-rubric scores for factual recall, knowledge recency, hallucination resistance and calibration. The overall score is their fixed 37.5/25/25/12.5 weighted aggregation. Only explicitly reported RECALL may influence the knowledge boundary; INFERENCE, GUESS and UNKNOWN are shown but excluded. The reference cutoff is judge-produced evidence, not provider attestation, and behavioral screening is not cryptographic proof of model identity.

Kør en uafhængig verifikation

Test det samme slutpunkt selv, eller gennemse andre offentlige rapporter, før du stoler på en annonceret modelidentitet.