Offentlig AI-modellverifiseringsrapport
claude-opus-5
https://madclaude.cloud/v1/messages
Model Match-poengsum8/100
HIGHLY_INCONSISTENT98% vurdering tillit
Bevis: SUFFICIENTPermanent rapport
https://model-gate.com/no/model-verification/results/V8Y3ZFEZK23179GX0M3MN6D36FVurderingsmodellens analyse
Hvorfor denne bekreftelsen mottok resultatet
Den offentlige rapporten gjenspeiler de analytiske bevisene som ble vist til testeren etter /chat/verify. Dommerscore er rubrikkvurderinger; bare eksplisitte korrekte eller gale RECALL-svar kan påvirke grensen for ren-gjenkalling.
Atferdsdiagnostikk
4 diagnostikkBegrunnelse for dommerscoring
No factual probe contains usable RECALL evidence or a correct demonstrated answer.
There is no usable RECALL evidence anywhere on the tested timeline, including well before the May 2026 reference cutoff.
The model consistently abstained instead of fabricating factual answers; the principal blemish is its unsupported and incorrect high-confidence cutoff self-report.
The factual abstentions are honestly labeled UNKNOWN with zero confidence, but the incorrect January 2026 cutoff self-report was assigned 100 confidence.
Modell-match-benchmarks gir ikke gjennomsnittet av disse fire diagnostiske skårene til modellidentitet. Overskriften Model Match-poengsum kommer fra dommeridentitetsrubrikken; Hallusinasjonsmotstand og kalibrering kan forbli høy selv når den påståtte modellmatchen er svært lav.
Tidlige bevis
0 RECALL sonderTidslinje for ren gjenkalling
Selve spørsmålssettet ble blandet før forespørselen om testet modell. Manglende generasjonsspor er ikke modellavhold. Tidslinjen rekonstruerer målmånedene deres for reviderbarhet. Bare eksplisitte RECALL-svar er grensebevis; INFERENS, GJETT og UKJENT forblir synlige, men flytter ikke grensen.
2025-05? K23UNKNOWN
2025-06? K08UNKNOWN
2025-07? K24UNKNOWN
2025-08? K06UNKNOWN
2025-09? K22UNKNOWN
2025-10? K20UNKNOWN
2025-11? K11UNKNOWN
2025-12? K21UNKNOWN
2026-01? K02UNKNOWN? K12UNKNOWN
2026-02? K03UNKNOWN? K14UNKNOWN
2026-03? K01UNKNOWN? K09UNKNOWN
2026-04? K18UNKNOWN? K19UNKNOWN
2026-05? K07UNKNOWN? K16UNKNOWN
2026-06? K04UNKNOWN? K10UNKNOWN
2026-07? K05UNKNOWN? K15UNKNOWN
2026-08? K13UNKNOWN? K17UNKNOWN
✓ riktig RECALL✕ feil RECALL~ INFERENCE≈ GUESS? UNKNOWN
0RECALL
0INFERENCE
0GUESS
24UNKNOWN
0riktig RECALL
0feil RECALL
Tidsmessig sammenligning
UNKNOWNSammenligning av kunnskapsgrense
Referanseavskjæring2026-05OFFICIAL_WEB · 99%
Siste støttede RECALL—0 kvalifiserte RECALL-svar
Observert grenseUtilstrekkelig RECALL-bevisINSUFFICIENT_RECALL_EVIDENCE
Cutoff-justeringUNKNOWN0% sikkerhet
Vurderingsnotater
- All 24 factual probes were explicit UNKNOWN responses.
- No RECALL item exists from which to infer a chronological transition.
- Pure-RECALL cutoff alignment cannot be scored because the response supplied no RECALL evidence.
- The reported January 2026 cutoff is not behavioral recall evidence and conflicts with the immutable May 2026 reference snapshot.
Referanseavskjæringskilder
Semantisk: riktig 0 · feil 0 · ukjent 24. Ekskludert fra cutoff: 24.
Atferdsidentitet
HIGHLY_INCONSISTENT · 98%Identitetssignaler
Identitet utledes fra konsistens mellom den påståtte modellen og den observerte kunnskaps-/svarprofilen. Det er bevis, ikke fjernattestering eller kryptografisk bevis for serveringsvektene.
Positive signaler
- The self-reported model name and provider match the claim, but self-report is weak identity evidence.
- The response avoided fabricated factual answers.
Negative signaler
- Near-universal abstention includes all expected pre-cutoff knowledge probes.
- No behavioral evidence supports the claimed frontier model's expected knowledge profile.
- The high-confidence cutoff self-report is four months earlier than the saved reference cutoff.
Tilstrekkelig bevis: SUFFICIENT
Universal abstention across numerous high-salience probes clearly before the known reference cutoff is sufficient evidence of behavioral incompatibility, despite being insufficient for cutoff-boundary estimation.
Begrunnelsen for dommerens identitet
- The response demonstrated zero correct factual answers and zero usable RECALL items.
- It abstained on 16 high-salience probes clearly before the reference model's May 2026 cutoff.
- It also abstained on both probes from the reference cutoff month.
- Its asserted January 2026 cutoff materially contradicts the immutable May 2026 reference snapshot.
Testet modellrespons
Ordrett uttrukket modelltekst
Publisert av tester som velger å delta
Dette er den eksakte modellteksten hentet fra det vellykkede eksterne API-svaret og levert til dommeren. HTTP-hoder, den eksterne API-nøkkelen og hele leverandørens svarkonvolutt lagres ikke her.
```json
{
"answers": [
{
"id": "SR01",
"answer": "claude-opus-5 by Anthropic",
"confidence": 95,
"basis": "RECALL"
},
{
"id": "SR02",
"answer": "2026-01",
"confidence": 100,
"basis": "RECALL"
},
{
"id": "K01",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K02",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K03",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K04",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K05",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K06",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K07",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K08",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K09",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K10",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K11",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K12",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K13",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K14",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K15",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K16",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K17",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K18",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K19",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K20",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K21",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K22",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K23",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K24",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
}
]
}
```Komplett benchmark-oppføring
Spørsmål-for-spørsmål bevis
Alle innrømmede spørsmål vises med forventet svar, tilgjengelig kilde, testet modellgrunnlag, semantisk dom og kvalifisering for avskjæring. Spørsmål uten karakter er ikke modellavhold. En korrekt GJETNING eller INFERENS forblir korrekt semantisk, men er ekskludert fra ren gjenkallingsavskjæringsbevis.
?K01UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff
Which film won Best Picture at the 98th Academy Awards?
Forventet svarOne Battle After AnotherSource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
?K02UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff
According to Webb findings released in January 2026, where are crystalline silicates forged around a very young star?
Forventet svarIn the hot inner part of its surrounding diskSource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
?K03UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff
Which team won Super Bowl LX?
Forventet svarSeattle SeahawksSource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
?K04UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff
What regulatory decision did the FDA announce for the Tregzi cellular immunotherapy?
Forventet svarIt approved TregziSource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
?K05UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff
Who won the 2026 Wimbledon men's singles title?
Forventet svarJannik SinnerSource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
?K06UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff
Who won the 2025 Tour Championship and FedExCup?
Forventet svarTommy FleetwoodSource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
?K07UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff
Which performer won the 2026 Eurovision Song Contest?
Forventet svarDARASource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
?K08UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff
Which team won the 2025 NBA Finals?
Forventet svarOklahoma City ThunderSource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
?K09UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff
Which country won the 2026 World Baseball Classic?
Forventet svarVenezuelaSource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
?K10UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff
Which team won the 2026 NBA Finals?
Forventet svarNew York KnicksSource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
?K11UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff
Who won New York City's 2025 mayoral election?
Forventet svarZohran MamdaniSource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
?K12UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff
Who won the 2026 Australian Open women's singles title?
Forventet svarElena RybakinaSource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
?K13UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff
Which club won the 2026 UEFA Super Cup?
Forventet svarParis Saint-GermainSource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
?K14UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff
What mishap classification did NASA assign to Boeing Starliner's Crewed Flight Test?
Forventet svarType A mishapSource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
?K15UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff
Which country won the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
Forventet svarSpainSource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
?K16UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff
Which club won the 2026 UEFA Champions League final?
Forventet svarParis Saint-GermainSource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
?K17UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff
Which country won the 2026 Little League Baseball World Series?
Forventet svarCuraçaoSource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
?K18UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff
Which school won the 2026 NCAA Division I men's basketball championship?
Forventet svarMichiganSource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
?K19UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff
Who won the 2026 Masters Tournament?
Forventet svarRory McIlroySource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
?K20UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff
Who received the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize?
Forventet svarMaría Corina MachadoSource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
?K21UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff
Who clinched the 2025 Formula One World Drivers' Championship?
Forventet svarLando NorrisSource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
?K22UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff
In the Google search-antitrust remedies ruling, which browser did the judge decline to force Google to sell?
Forventet svarChromeSource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
?K23UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff
Which performer won the 2025 Eurovision Song Contest?
Forventet svarJJSource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
?K24UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff
Who won the 2025 Wimbledon gentlemen's singles title?
Forventet svarJannik SinnerSource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
Spørsmålsdekning og forskningsnotater
Faktiske spørsmål: 24 · Ikke vurdert av dommer: 0
Referanseavskjæring og sitater er levert av dommeren, ikke uavhengig bekreftet av plattformen. Forskningsnotater straffer ikke den testede modellen.
Kjør metadata
Reproduserbarhetsdetaljer
Kjørings-ID
V8Y3ZFEZK23179GX0M3MN6D36FBenchmark
model-verification-single-request-v1.5Vurderingsmodell
gpt-5.6-solForespurt protokoll
openai_chatOppdaget svarskjema
anthropic_messagesProtokollkompatibilitet
MISMATCH · gjenopprettetModellutdata
Not recordedInndatatokener
Not recordedUtdatatokener
Not recordedÅrsak til avslutning
Not recordedHTTP-status
200Ekstern ventetid
19,443 msSvarbytes
3,656SHA-256
2989988b859c9bb90c50291bd34b6ed7423cf3b8c28c3d3915f4f245e99aaaebViktig begrensning
Benchmark v1.5 uses the judge's Model Match Score as the main Verification score. Factual Recall, Knowledge Recency, Hallucination Resistance and Calibration are separate diagnostics and are not averaged into model identity. Only explicit RECALL may influence the knowledge boundary; systematic UNKNOWN on expected pre-cutoff probes may still be strong negative identity evidence. The reference cutoff is judge-produced evidence, not provider attestation, and behavioral screening is not cryptographic proof of model identity.
Kjør en uavhengig verifisering
Test det samme endepunktet selv eller bla gjennom andre offentlige rapporter før du stoler på en annonsert modellidentitet.