claude-opus-5
https://madclaude.cloud/v1/messages
https://model-gate.com/no/model-verification/results/MBAJ09XSXC0CSHVAV73EJTBTRQHvorfor denne bekreftelsen mottok resultatet
Den offentlige rapporten gjenspeiler de analytiske bevisene som ble vist til testeren etter /chat/verify. Dommerscore er rubrikkvurderinger; bare eksplisitte korrekte eller gale RECALL-svar kan påvirke grensen for ren-gjenkalling.
Begrunnelse for dommerscoring
No item contains usable RECALL evidence, so the response demonstrates no factual recall.
There is no usable recent RECALL evidence at any point in the tested timeline.
The response consistently abstains and makes no unsupported factual assertions.
Every abstention is labeled UNKNOWN with zero confidence, accurately representing the absence of an answer.
Historisk benchmarknotat: denne arkiverte v1.4 totalpoengsummen brukte den tidligere faste diagnostiske aggregeringen. Den beholdes for reproduserbarhet og må ikke tolkes som en v1.5 Model Match-poengsum.
Tidslinje for ren gjenkalling
Selve spørsmålssettet ble blandet før forespørselen om testet modell. Manglende generasjonsspor er ikke modellavhold. Tidslinjen rekonstruerer målmånedene deres for reviderbarhet. Bare eksplisitte RECALL-svar er grensebevis; INFERENS, GJETT og UKJENT forblir synlige, men flytter ikke grensen.
Sammenligning av kunnskapsgrense
- No answer was reported with a RECALL basis.
- No positive or negative recall sequence exists from which to infer a transition.
- The May 2026 reference cutoff is known, but the tested response supplies no pure-RECALL behavioral evidence for comparison.
- A cutoff boundary cannot be manufactured from explicit abstentions.
Semantisk: riktig 0 · feil 0 · ukjent 24. Ekskludert fra cutoff: 24.
Identitetssignaler
Identitet utledes fra konsistens mellom den påståtte modellen og den observerte kunnskaps-/svarprofilen. Det er bevis, ikke fjernattestering eller kryptografisk bevis for serveringsvektene.
Positive signaler
- The response is internally consistent and avoids fabrication.
- All required answer IDs are present and recoverable.
Negative signaler
- No factual answer or RECALL evidence was supplied for any of the 24 probes.
- The endpoint's claimed model and API identifier are untrusted self-report and receive no behavioral corroboration.
- The complete lack of demonstrated pre-cutoff knowledge is atypical of the claimed reference snapshot.
- The response provides no behavioral evidence supporting the claimed model identity.
- Universal abstention includes numerous high-salience probes dated before the saved May 2026 reference cutoff.
- Because there are no incorrect recall claims, the evidence supports suspicion rather than a highly inconsistent determination.
Ordrett uttrukket modelltekst
Dette er den eksakte modellteksten hentet fra det vellykkede eksterne API-svaret og levert til dommeren. HTTP-hoder, den eksterne API-nøkkelen og hele leverandørens svarkonvolutt lagres ikke her.
```json
{
"answers": [
{
"id": "SR01",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "SR02",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K01",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K02",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K03",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K04",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K05",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K06",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K07",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K08",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K09",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K10",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K11",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K12",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K13",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K14",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K15",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K16",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K17",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K18",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K19",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K20",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K21",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K22",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K23",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K24",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
}
]
}
```Spørsmål-for-spørsmål bevis
Alle innrømmede spørsmål vises med forventet svar, tilgjengelig kilde, testet modellgrunnlag, semantisk dom og kvalifisering for avskjæring. Spørsmål uten karakter er ikke modellavhold. En korrekt GJETNING eller INFERENS forblir korrekt semantisk, men er ekskludert fra ren gjenkallingsavskjæringsbevis.
Who won Colombia's 2026 presidential runoff election?
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2026 Masters Tournament?
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
Which party won Hungary's 2026 parliamentary election?
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
Which instability did the Inouye Solar Telescope provide the first experimental confirmation of in the Sun's photosphere?
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
Who was declared the winner of Zambia's 2026 presidential election?
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
Which series won Outstanding Drama Series at the 77th Emmy Awards?
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
Who clinched the 2025 Formula One World Drivers' Championship at the Abu Dhabi Grand Prix?
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
Which film won Best Motion Picture — Drama at the 2026 Golden Globes?
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2025 Wimbledon gentlemen's singles title?
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
Which club won the 2025 UEFA Super Cup?
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
Which country won the 2026 World Baseball Classic?
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
Which team won Super Bowl LX?
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
Which artist won Album of the Year at the 2026 Grammy Awards?
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
Who won New York City's 2025 mayoral election?
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
Who received the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize?
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2026 Wimbledon ladies' singles title?
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2026 Australian Open women's singles title?
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
Which country won the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
Which film won Best Picture at the 98th Academy Awards?
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
Which team won the 2025 NBA championship?
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
Which cardinal was elected pope and took the name Leo XIV in the May 2025 conclave?
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
Which film won the Palme d'Or at the 2026 Cannes Film Festival?
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
Which team won the 2026 NBA championship?
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
Which performer won the 2026 Eurovision Song Contest?
Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.
Spørsmålsdekning og forskningsnotater
Faktiske spørsmål: 24 · Ikke vurdert av dommer: 0
Referanseavskjæring og sitater er levert av dommeren, ikke uavhengig bekreftet av plattformen. Forskningsnotater straffer ikke den testede modellen.
Reproduserbarhetsdetaljer
MBAJ09XSXC0CSHVAV73EJTBTRQmodel-verification-single-request-v1.4gpt-5.6-solopenai_chatanthropic_messagesMISMATCH · gjenopprettetNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recorded20015,654 ms3,702d783ad1531895d72131fa6c7040adf91ec505a5a1cf65146e95e2eb001047f04Benchmark v1.4 uses judge-rubric scores for factual recall, knowledge recency, hallucination resistance and calibration. The overall score is their fixed 37.5/25/25/12.5 weighted aggregation. Only explicitly reported RECALL may influence the knowledge boundary; INFERENCE, GUESS and UNKNOWN are shown but excluded. The reference cutoff is judge-produced evidence, not provider attestation, and behavioral screening is not cryptographic proof of model identity.
Kjør en uavhengig verifisering
Test det samme endepunktet selv eller bla gjennom andre offentlige rapporter før du stoler på en annonsert modellidentitet.