← Offentlig verifikasjonsregistermodel-verification-single-request-v1.4
Offentlig AI-modellverifiseringsrapport

claude-opus-5

https://madclaude.cloud/v1/messages

openai_chatgpt-5.6-solSep 8, 2026 14:03 UTC
Eldre kvalitetspoeng38/100
SUSPICIOUS65% vurdering tillit
Permanent rapporthttps://model-gate.com/no/model-verification/results/MBAJ09XSXC0CSHVAV73EJTBTRQ
Telegram ↗X ↗
Faktisk tilbakekalling0
Kunnskapens aktualitet0
Hallusinasjonsmotstand100
Kalibrering100
Påstått modellclaude-opus-5
Dommeravgjort modellClaude Opus 5Anthropic
Endepunktvertmadclaude.cloud
Ekstern responsmodellfeltclaude-opus-5
Vurderingsmodellens analyse

Hvorfor denne bekreftelsen mottok resultatet

Den offentlige rapporten gjenspeiler de analytiske bevisene som ble vist til testeren etter /chat/verify. Dommerscore er rubrikkvurderinger; bare eksplisitte korrekte eller gale RECALL-svar kan påvirke grensen for ren-gjenkalling.

Atferdsdiagnostikk

Begrunnelse for dommerscoring

4 diagnostikk
Faktisk tilbakekalling0/100

No item contains usable RECALL evidence, so the response demonstrates no factual recall.

Kunnskapens aktualitet0/100

There is no usable recent RECALL evidence at any point in the tested timeline.

Hallusinasjonsmotstand100/100

The response consistently abstains and makes no unsupported factual assertions.

Kalibrering100/100

Every abstention is labeled UNKNOWN with zero confidence, accurately representing the absence of an answer.

Historisk benchmarknotat: denne arkiverte v1.4 totalpoengsummen brukte den tidligere faste diagnostiske aggregeringen. Den beholdes for reproduserbarhet og må ikke tolkes som en v1.5 Model Match-poengsum.

Tidlige bevis

Tidslinje for ren gjenkalling

0 RECALL sonder

Selve spørsmålssettet ble blandet før forespørselen om testet modell. Manglende generasjonsspor er ikke modellavhold. Tidslinjen rekonstruerer målmånedene deres for reviderbarhet. Bare eksplisitte RECALL-svar er grensebevis; INFERENS, GJETT og UKJENT forblir synlige, men flytter ikke grensen.

2025-05? K21UNKNOWN
2025-06? K20UNKNOWN
2025-07? K09UNKNOWN
2025-08? K10UNKNOWN
2025-09? K06UNKNOWN
2025-10? K15UNKNOWN
2025-11? K14UNKNOWN
2025-12? K07UNKNOWN
2026-01? K08UNKNOWN? K17UNKNOWN
2026-02? K12UNKNOWN? K13UNKNOWN
2026-03? K11UNKNOWN? K19UNKNOWN
2026-04? K02UNKNOWN? K03UNKNOWN
2026-05? K22UNKNOWN? K24UNKNOWN
2026-06? K01UNKNOWN? K23UNKNOWN
2026-07? K16UNKNOWN? K18UNKNOWN
2026-08? K04UNKNOWN? K05UNKNOWN
✓ riktig RECALL✕ feil RECALL~ INFERENCE≈ GUESS? UNKNOWN
0RECALL
0INFERENCE
0GUESS
24UNKNOWN
0riktig RECALL
0feil RECALL
Tidsmessig sammenligning

Sammenligning av kunnskapsgrense

UNKNOWN
Referanseavskjæring2026-05OFFICIAL_WEB · 100%
Siste støttede RECALL—0 kvalifiserte RECALL-svar
Observert grenseUtilstrekkelig RECALL-bevisINSUFFICIENT_RECALL_EVIDENCE
Cutoff-justeringUNKNOWN0% sikkerhet
Vurderingsnotater
  • No answer was reported with a RECALL basis.
  • No positive or negative recall sequence exists from which to infer a transition.
  • The May 2026 reference cutoff is known, but the tested response supplies no pure-RECALL behavioral evidence for comparison.
  • A cutoff boundary cannot be manufactured from explicit abstentions.

Semantisk: riktig 0 · feil 0 · ukjent 24. Ekskludert fra cutoff: 24.

Atferdsidentitet

Identitetssignaler

SUSPICIOUS · 65%

Identitet utledes fra konsistens mellom den påståtte modellen og den observerte kunnskaps-/svarprofilen. Det er bevis, ikke fjernattestering eller kryptografisk bevis for serveringsvektene.

Positive signaler

  • The response is internally consistent and avoids fabrication.
  • All required answer IDs are present and recoverable.

Negative signaler

  • No factual answer or RECALL evidence was supplied for any of the 24 probes.
  • The endpoint's claimed model and API identifier are untrusted self-report and receive no behavioral corroboration.
  • The complete lack of demonstrated pre-cutoff knowledge is atypical of the claimed reference snapshot.
Begrunnelsen for dommerens identitet
  • The response provides no behavioral evidence supporting the claimed model identity.
  • Universal abstention includes numerous high-salience probes dated before the saved May 2026 reference cutoff.
  • Because there are no incorrect recall claims, the evidence supports suspicion rather than a highly inconsistent determination.
Testet modellrespons

Ordrett uttrukket modelltekst

Publisert av tester som velger å delta

Dette er den eksakte modellteksten hentet fra det vellykkede eksterne API-svaret og levert til dommeren. HTTP-hoder, den eksterne API-nøkkelen og hele leverandørens svarkonvolutt lagres ikke her.

```json
{
  "answers": [
    {
      "id": "SR01",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "SR02",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K01",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K02",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K03",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K04",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K05",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K06",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K07",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K08",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K09",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K10",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K11",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K12",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K13",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K14",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K15",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K16",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K17",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K18",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K19",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K20",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K21",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K22",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K23",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    },
    {
      "id": "K24",
      "answer": "UNKNOWN",
      "confidence": 0,
      "basis": "UNKNOWN"
    }
  ]
}
```
Komplett benchmark-oppføring

Spørsmål-for-spørsmål bevis

Alle innrømmede spørsmål vises med forventet svar, tilgjengelig kilde, testet modellgrunnlag, semantisk dom og kvalifisering for avskjæring. Spørsmål uten karakter er ikke modellavhold. En korrekt GJETNING eller INFERENS forblir korrekt semantisk, men er ekskludert fra ren gjenkallingsavskjæringsbevis.

?K01UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff

Who won Colombia's 2026 presidential runoff election?

Forventet svarAbelardo de la EspriellaSource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%

Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.

?K02UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff

Who won the 2026 Masters Tournament?

Forventet svarRory McIlroySource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%

Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.

?K03UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff

Which party won Hungary's 2026 parliamentary election?

Forventet svarTisza PartySource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%

Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.

?K04UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff

Which instability did the Inouye Solar Telescope provide the first experimental confirmation of in the Sun's photosphere?

Forventet svarKelvin-Helmholtz instabilitySource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%

Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.

?K05UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff

Who was declared the winner of Zambia's 2026 presidential election?

Forventet svarHakainde HichilemaSource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%

Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.

?K06UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff

Which series won Outstanding Drama Series at the 77th Emmy Awards?

Forventet svarThe PittSource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%

Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.

?K07UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff

Who clinched the 2025 Formula One World Drivers' Championship at the Abu Dhabi Grand Prix?

Forventet svarLando NorrisSource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%

Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.

?K08UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff

Which film won Best Motion Picture — Drama at the 2026 Golden Globes?

Forventet svarHamnetSource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%

Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.

?K09UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff

Who won the 2025 Wimbledon gentlemen's singles title?

Forventet svarJannik SinnerSource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%

Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.

?K10UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff

Which club won the 2025 UEFA Super Cup?

Forventet svarParis Saint-GermainSource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%

Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.

?K11UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff

Which country won the 2026 World Baseball Classic?

Forventet svarVenezuelaSource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%

Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.

?K12UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff

Which team won Super Bowl LX?

Forventet svarSeattle SeahawksSource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%

Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.

?K13UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff

Which artist won Album of the Year at the 2026 Grammy Awards?

Forventet svarBad BunnySource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%

Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.

?K14UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff

Who won New York City's 2025 mayoral election?

Forventet svarZohran MamdaniSource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%

Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.

?K15UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff

Who received the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize?

Forventet svarMaria Corina MachadoSource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%

Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.

?K16UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff

Who won the 2026 Wimbledon ladies' singles title?

Forventet svarLinda NoskovaSource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%

Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.

?K17UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff

Who won the 2026 Australian Open women's singles title?

Forventet svarElena RybakinaSource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%

Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.

?K18UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff

Which country won the 2026 FIFA World Cup?

Forventet svarSpainSource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%

Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.

?K19UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff

Which film won Best Picture at the 98th Academy Awards?

Forventet svarOne Battle After AnotherSource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%

Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.

?K20UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff

Which team won the 2025 NBA championship?

Forventet svarOklahoma City ThunderSource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%

Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.

?K21UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff

Which cardinal was elected pope and took the name Leo XIV in the May 2025 conclave?

Forventet svarRobert Francis PrevostSource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%

Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.

?K22UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff

Which film won the Palme d'Or at the 2026 Cannes Film Festival?

Forventet svarFjordSource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%

Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.

?K23UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff

Which team won the 2026 NBA championship?

Forventet svarNew York KnicksSource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%

Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.

?K24UNKNOWNekskludert fra cutoff

Which performer won the 2026 Eurovision Song Contest?

Forventet svarDARASource ↗
Testet modellsvarUNKNOWN0% · UNKNOWN
Vurderingsresultat: UNKNOWNRapporterte tillit: 0%

Vurderingsnotat: Explicit abstention.

Spørsmålsdekning og forskningsnotater

Faktiske spørsmål: 24 · Ikke vurdert av dommer: 0

Referanseavskjæring og sitater er levert av dommeren, ikke uavhengig bekreftet av plattformen. Forskningsnotater straffer ikke den testede modellen.

Kjør metadata

Reproduserbarhetsdetaljer

Kjørings-IDMBAJ09XSXC0CSHVAV73EJTBTRQ
Benchmarkmodel-verification-single-request-v1.4
Vurderingsmodellgpt-5.6-sol
Forespurt protokollopenai_chat
Oppdaget svarskjemaanthropic_messages
ProtokollkompatibilitetMISMATCH · gjenopprettet
ModellutdataNot recorded
InndatatokenerNot recorded
UtdatatokenerNot recorded
Årsak til avslutningNot recorded
HTTP-status200
Ekstern ventetid15,654 ms
Svarbytes3,702
SHA-256d783ad1531895d72131fa6c7040adf91ec505a5a1cf65146e95e2eb001047f04
Viktig begrensning

Benchmark v1.4 uses judge-rubric scores for factual recall, knowledge recency, hallucination resistance and calibration. The overall score is their fixed 37.5/25/25/12.5 weighted aggregation. Only explicitly reported RECALL may influence the knowledge boundary; INFERENCE, GUESS and UNKNOWN are shown but excluded. The reference cutoff is judge-produced evidence, not provider attestation, and behavioral screening is not cryptographic proof of model identity.

Kjør en uavhengig verifisering

Test det samme endepunktet selv eller bla gjennom andre offentlige rapporter før du stoler på en annonsert modellidentitet.