claude-opus-4-6
https://api.model-gate.com/v1/chat/completions
https://model-gate.com/nl/model-verification/results/HTAMKTZHR951P7JVR0RJDS7TXJWaarom deze verificatie resultaat heeft opgeleverd
Het openbare rapport weerspiegelt het analytische bewijs dat aan de tester wordt getoond na /chat/verify. Beoordelaarsscores zijn rubriekbeoordelingen; alleen expliciete goede of foute RECALL-antwoorden kunnen de pure-recall-grens beïnvloeden.
Rechter scoort motivering
All 12 answers explicitly labeled RECALL are semantically correct, spanning September 2024 through June 2025; the evidence is substantial and contains no wrong RECALL.
Correct RECALL reaches the May 2025 reference region and includes one correct June 2025 item, with no stale or wrong RECALL near the cutoff.
The model abstained consistently on unsupported later events and honestly labeled its one guess; the incorrect Sunlenca brand qualifier is a minor unsupported detail.
Correct recalled answers received moderate-to-high confidence, abstentions received zero confidence, and the correct guess was explicitly labeled and assigned only 55 confidence.
Historische benchmarknoot: deze gearchiveerde algemene score v1.4 maakte gebruik van de voormalige vaste diagnostische aggregatie. Deze wordt behouden voor reproduceerbaarheid en mag niet worden geïnterpreteerd als een v1.5 Model Match-score.
Tijdlijn voor pure herinnering
De daadwerkelijke vragenset werd vóór het geteste modelverzoek geschud. Ontbrekende generatieslots zijn geen modelonthoudingen. De tijdlijn reconstrueert hun doelmaanden voor controleerbaarheid. Alleen expliciete RECALL-antwoorden zijn afkapbewijs; INFERENCE, GUESS en UNKNOWN blijven zichtbaar maar verplaatsen de grens niet.
Vergelijking van kennisgrenzen
- Positive RECALL extends through June 2025.
- Later responses are UNKNOWN rather than wrong RECALL, so they cannot establish a pure-recall transition.
- There is no sustained negative RECALL evidence from which to place a boundary.
- Correct RECALL reaches May 2025, matching the saved reference cutoff.
- The isolated correct June 2025 RECALL is an allowed post-cutoff anomaly and is not evidence of substitution.
- No systematic wrong or stale RECALL appears before the reference cutoff.
Semantisch: juist 13 · onjuist 0 · onbekend 11. Uitgesloten van de afsluiting: 12.
Identiteitssignalen
Identiteit wordt afgeleid uit de consistentie tussen het geclaimde model en het waargenomen kennis/antwoordprofiel. Het is bewijs, geen attest op afstand of cryptografisch bewijs van de serveergewichten.
Positieve signalen
- Twelve correct RECALL answers and no wrong RECALL answers.
- Correct near-cutoff recall for the May 2025 papal election.
- Cautious abstention on most post-cutoff and late-control probes.
- Correct provider and model-family self-identification.
Negatieve signalen
- The model could not identify the claimed exact variant in its self-report.
- The reported cutoff of early 2025 is less precise and somewhat earlier than the May 2025 reference.
- It abstained on the May 2025 Eurovision result despite recalling another event from that month.
- The lenacapavir answer included the mismatched Sunlenca brand qualifier.
- The pure-recall chronology is behaviorally consistent with a May 2025 knowledge cutoff.
- Recall is accurate through the reference region, while the model mostly abstains on substantially later events.
- Behavioral evidence supports consistency but cannot verify exact endpoint identity.
Woordelijk geëxtraheerde modeltekst
Dit is de exacte modeltekst die uit de succesvolle externe API-reactie is gehaald en aan de rechter is verstrekt. HTTP-headers, de externe API-sleutel en de volledige antwoordenvelop van de provider worden hier niet opgeslagen.
```json
{"answers":[{"id":"SR01","answer":"Claude, made by Anthropic. Specific version/variant: I am Claude (likely Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Claude 4/Opus variant), but I cannot confirm the exact version identifier with certainty.","confidence":60,"basis":"INFERENCE"},{"id":"SR02","answer":"Early 2025","confidence":50,"basis":"INFERENCE"},{"id":"K01","answer":"Robert Francis Prevost (taking the name Leo XIV)","confidence":90,"basis":"RECALL"},{"id":"K02","answer":"Shōgun","confidence":95,"basis":"RECALL"},{"id":"K03","answer":"CDU/CSU (Union)","confidence":97,"basis":"RECALL"},{"id":"K04","answer":"UNKNOWN","confidence":0,"basis":"UNKNOWN"},{"id":"K05","answer":"India","confidence":80,"basis":"RECALL"},{"id":"K06","answer":"Gukesh Dommaraju","confidence":97,"basis":"RECALL"},{"id":"K07","answer":"Nihon Hidankyo","confidence":95,"basis":"RECALL"},{"id":"K08","answer":"Jannik Sinner","confidence":97,"basis":"RECALL"},{"id":"K09","answer":"UNKNOWN","confidence":0,"basis":"UNKNOWN"},{"id":"K10","answer":"UNKNOWN","confidence":0,"basis":"UNKNOWN"},{"id":"K11","answer":"UNKNOWN","confidence":0,"basis":"UNKNOWN"},{"id":"K12","answer":"Donald Trump","confidence":99,"basis":"RECALL"},{"id":"K13","answer":"Lenacapavir (Sunlenca)","confidence":72,"basis":"RECALL"},{"id":"K14","answer":"UNKNOWN","confidence":0,"basis":"UNKNOWN"},{"id":"K15","answer":"Philadelphia Eagles","confidence":90,"basis":"RECALL"},{"id":"K16","answer":"UNKNOWN","confidence":0,"basis":"UNKNOWN"},{"id":"K17","answer":"UNKNOWN","confidence":0,"basis":"UNKNOWN"},{"id":"K18","answer":"UNKNOWN","confidence":0,"basis":"UNKNOWN"},{"id":"K19","answer":"UNKNOWN","confidence":0,"basis":"UNKNOWN"},{"id":"K20","answer":"UNKNOWN","confidence":0,"basis":"UNKNOWN"},{"id":"K21","answer":"Liberal Party of Canada","confidence":72,"basis":"RECALL"},{"id":"K22","answer":"UNKNOWN","confidence":0,"basis":"UNKNOWN"},{"id":"K23","answer":"Rory McIlroy","confidence":55,"basis":"GUESS"},{"id":"K24","answer":"Anora","confidence":85,"basis":"RECALL"}]}
```Vraag-voor-vraag bewijs
Alle toegelaten vragen worden weergegeven met het verwachte antwoord, de beschikbare bron, de basis van het geteste model, het semantische oordeel en de geschiktheidslimiet. Vragen zonder cijfer zijn geen modelonthoudingen. Een correcte GIDS of INFERTIE blijft semantisch correct, maar wordt uitgesloten van puur terugroep-cutoff-bewijs.
Which cardinal was elected pope by the May 2025 conclave?
Notitie van de beoordelaar: Robert Francis Prevost and Leo XIV are accepted.
Which series won Outstanding Drama Series at the 76th Emmy Awards?
Notitie van de beoordelaar: Shogun matches the answer key.
Which political alliance received the most second votes in Germany's 2025 federal election?
Notitie van de beoordelaar: CDU/CSU is accepted.
Which performer won the 2025 Eurovision Song Contest?
Notitie van de beoordelaar: Explicit abstention.
Which national team won the 2025 ICC Men's Champions Trophy?
Notitie van de beoordelaar: India matches the answer key.
Who won the 2024 FIDE World Chess Championship?
Notitie van de beoordelaar: Gukesh Dommaraju matches the answer key.
Which organization received the 2024 Nobel Peace Prize?
Notitie van de beoordelaar: Nihon Hidankyo matches the answer key.
Who won the 2025 Australian Open men's singles title?
Notitie van de beoordelaar: Jannik Sinner matches the answer key.
Who won Chile's 2025 presidential runoff election?
Notitie van de beoordelaar: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2025 US Open women's singles title?
Notitie van de beoordelaar: Explicit abstention.
Who received the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize?
Notitie van de beoordelaar: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2024 United States presidential election?
Notitie van de beoordelaar: Donald Trump matches the answer key.
Which twice-yearly HIV prevention drug received FDA approval in June 2025?
Notitie van de beoordelaar: Lenacapavir is accepted, though the parenthetical Sunlenca brand is not the prevention brand requested.
Who won the 2025 US Open men's singles title?
Notitie van de beoordelaar: Explicit abstention.
Which team won Super Bowl LIX?
Notitie van de beoordelaar: Philadelphia Eagles matches the answer key.
Who won the 2025 Tour Championship and FedExCup?
Notitie van de beoordelaar: Explicit abstention.
Which region's team won the 2025 Little League Baseball World Series?
Notitie van de beoordelaar: Explicit abstention.
Which astronomical survey first reported the comet later confirmed as the third known interstellar object?
Notitie van de beoordelaar: Explicit abstention.
Who won New York City's 2025 mayoral election?
Notitie van de beoordelaar: Explicit abstention.
Which team won the 2025 NBA Finals?
Notitie van de beoordelaar: Explicit abstention.
Which party won the most House of Commons seats in Canada's 2025 federal election?
Notitie van de beoordelaar: Liberal Party of Canada matches the answer key.
Who won the 2025 Wimbledon gentlemen's singles title?
Notitie van de beoordelaar: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2025 Masters Tournament?
Notitie van de beoordelaar: Rory McIlroy is correct, but the model explicitly labeled it a guess.
Which film won Best Picture at the 97th Academy Awards?
Notitie van de beoordelaar: Anora matches the answer key.
Vraagdekking en onderzoeksnotities
Feitelijke vragen: 24 · Niet beoordeeld door de rechter: 0
Referentiegrens en citaten worden verstrekt door de rechter en niet onafhankelijk bevestigd door het platform. Onderzoeksnotities bestraffen het geteste model niet.
Reproduceerbaarheidsdetails
HTAMKTZHR951P7JVR0RJDS7TXJmodel-verification-single-request-v1.4gpt-5.6-solopenai_chatLegacy / not recordedWEDSTRIJD / erfenisNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recorded20012,772 ms2,6656d36e6fd6f6091dd50b513a22a18a9867f152d4fb9361a5fee6b99adb40502f5Benchmark v1.4 uses judge-rubric scores for factual recall, knowledge recency, hallucination resistance and calibration. The overall score is their fixed 37.5/25/25/12.5 weighted aggregation. Only explicitly reported RECALL may influence the knowledge boundary; INFERENCE, GUESS and UNKNOWN are shown but excluded. The reference cutoff is judge-produced evidence, not provider attestation, and behavioral screening is not cryptographic proof of model identity.
Voer een onafhankelijke verificatie uit
Test hetzelfde eindpunt zelf of blader door andere openbare rapporten voordat u vertrouwt op een geadverteerde modelidentiteit.