claude-opus-5
https://madclaude.cloud/v1/messages
https://model-gate.com/ja/model-verification/results/MBAJ09XSXC0CSHVAV73EJTBTRQこの検証結果が得られた理由
公開レポートは、/chat/verify の後にテスターに示される分析証拠を反映しています。審査員のスコアはルーブリック評価です。純粋なリコールのカットオフ境界に影響を与えることができるのは、明示的な正解または不正解の RECALL の回答のみです。
ジャッジの採点根拠
No item contains usable RECALL evidence, so the response demonstrates no factual recall.
There is no usable recent RECALL evidence at any point in the tested timeline.
The response consistently abstains and makes no unsupported factual assertions.
Every abstention is labeled UNKNOWN with zero confidence, accurately representing the absence of an answer.
過去のベンチマークのメモ: このアーカイブされた v1.4 の全体スコアでは、以前の固定診断集計が使用されています。これは再現性のために保持されており、v1.5 のモデル マッチ スコアとして解釈しないでください。
純粋な想起のタイムライン
実際の質問セットは、テスト済みモデルのリクエストの前にシャッフルされました。世代スロットの欠落はモデル棄権ではありません。タイムラインは、監査可能性を考慮して目標月を再構成します。明示的な「RECALL」の回答のみが完全な証拠となります。 INFERENCE、GUESS、UNKNOWN は表示されたままですが、境界は移動しません。
知識のカットオフ比較
- No answer was reported with a RECALL basis.
- No positive or negative recall sequence exists from which to infer a transition.
- The May 2026 reference cutoff is known, but the tested response supplies no pure-RECALL behavioral evidence for comparison.
- A cutoff boundary cannot be manufactured from explicit abstentions.
セマンティック: 正解 0 · 不正解 0 · 不明 24. カットオフから除外されます: 24.
アイデンティティシグナル
同一性は、主張されたモデルと観察された知識/回答プロファイルの間の一貫性から推測されます。これは証拠であり、リモート認証や分量の暗号による証明ではありません。
ポジティブなシグナル
- The response is internally consistent and avoids fabrication.
- All required answer IDs are present and recoverable.
負の信号
- No factual answer or RECALL evidence was supplied for any of the 24 probes.
- The endpoint's claimed model and API identifier are untrusted self-report and receive no behavioral corroboration.
- The complete lack of demonstrated pre-cutoff knowledge is atypical of the claimed reference snapshot.
- The response provides no behavioral evidence supporting the claimed model identity.
- Universal abstention includes numerous high-salience probes dated before the saved May 2026 reference cutoff.
- Because there are no incorrect recall claims, the evidence supports suspicion rather than a highly inconsistent determination.
逐語的に抽出されたモデルテキスト
これは、成功した外部 API 応答から抽出され、審査員に提供される正確なモデル テキストです。 HTTP ヘッダー、外部 API キー、および完全なプロバイダー応答エンベロープはここには保存されません。
```json
{
"answers": [
{
"id": "SR01",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "SR02",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K01",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K02",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K03",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K04",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K05",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K06",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K07",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K08",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K09",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K10",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K11",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K12",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K13",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K14",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K15",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K16",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K17",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K18",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K19",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K20",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K21",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K22",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K23",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
},
{
"id": "K24",
"answer": "UNKNOWN",
"confidence": 0,
"basis": "UNKNOWN"
}
]
}
```質問ごとの証拠
認められたすべての質問は、予想される回答、利用可能なソース、テストされたモデルの基礎、意味論的判定、およびカットオフ適格性とともに表示されます。採点されていない質問は模範棄権にはなりません。正しい GUESS または INFERENCE は、意味的には正しいままですが、純粋な想起のカットオフ証拠からは除外されます。
Who won Colombia's 2026 presidential runoff election?
評価メモ: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2026 Masters Tournament?
評価メモ: Explicit abstention.
Which party won Hungary's 2026 parliamentary election?
評価メモ: Explicit abstention.
Which instability did the Inouye Solar Telescope provide the first experimental confirmation of in the Sun's photosphere?
評価メモ: Explicit abstention.
Who was declared the winner of Zambia's 2026 presidential election?
評価メモ: Explicit abstention.
Which series won Outstanding Drama Series at the 77th Emmy Awards?
評価メモ: Explicit abstention.
Who clinched the 2025 Formula One World Drivers' Championship at the Abu Dhabi Grand Prix?
評価メモ: Explicit abstention.
Which film won Best Motion Picture — Drama at the 2026 Golden Globes?
評価メモ: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2025 Wimbledon gentlemen's singles title?
評価メモ: Explicit abstention.
Which club won the 2025 UEFA Super Cup?
評価メモ: Explicit abstention.
Which country won the 2026 World Baseball Classic?
評価メモ: Explicit abstention.
Which team won Super Bowl LX?
評価メモ: Explicit abstention.
Which artist won Album of the Year at the 2026 Grammy Awards?
評価メモ: Explicit abstention.
Who won New York City's 2025 mayoral election?
評価メモ: Explicit abstention.
Who received the 2025 Nobel Peace Prize?
評価メモ: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2026 Wimbledon ladies' singles title?
評価メモ: Explicit abstention.
Who won the 2026 Australian Open women's singles title?
評価メモ: Explicit abstention.
Which country won the 2026 FIFA World Cup?
評価メモ: Explicit abstention.
Which film won Best Picture at the 98th Academy Awards?
評価メモ: Explicit abstention.
Which team won the 2025 NBA championship?
評価メモ: Explicit abstention.
Which cardinal was elected pope and took the name Leo XIV in the May 2025 conclave?
評価メモ: Explicit abstention.
Which film won the Palme d'Or at the 2026 Cannes Film Festival?
評価メモ: Explicit abstention.
Which team won the 2026 NBA championship?
評価メモ: Explicit abstention.
Which performer won the 2026 Eurovision Song Contest?
評価メモ: Explicit abstention.
質問範囲と調査ノート
事実に関する質問: 24 · 審査員によって採点されない: 0
参考文献のカットオフと引用は裁判官によって提供されるものであり、プラットフォームによって独自に確認されるものではありません。研究ノートは、テストされたモデルにペナルティを与えるものではありません。
再現性の詳細
MBAJ09XSXC0CSHVAV73EJTBTRQmodel-verification-single-request-v1.4gpt-5.6-solopenai_chatanthropic_messages不一致 · 回復しましたNot recordedNot recordedNot recordedNot recorded20015,654 ms3,702d783ad1531895d72131fa6c7040adf91ec505a5a1cf65146e95e2eb001047f04Benchmark v1.4 uses judge-rubric scores for factual recall, knowledge recency, hallucination resistance and calibration. The overall score is their fixed 37.5/25/25/12.5 weighted aggregation. Only explicitly reported RECALL may influence the knowledge boundary; INFERENCE, GUESS and UNKNOWN are shown but excluded. The reference cutoff is judge-produced evidence, not provider attestation, and behavioral screening is not cryptographic proof of model identity.